How Birds Fly Differently Across Languages?—Manner Salience of <i>Flight</i> Events in English and Chinese

The portrayal of motion events across languages has been extensively explored, typically focusing on human locomotion. This study, however, diverges from the norm by examining the representation of motion events associated with avian species. The research scrutinizes how motion events involving avian species are represented in English and Chinese, focusing on manner of motion. English utilizes a wider variety of specific manner verbs, often borrowing from adjacent categories, while Chinese relies more on basic manner verbs and manner adverbials. An additional exploration utilizing a parallel corpus highlights a prevalent reliance in Chinese on the basic manner verb 飞 fēi “fly.” Notably, disparity in manner salience in describing flight events emerge early in linguistic development, even in children’s lyrics. The factors contributing to the gap of manner salience include openness of manner category, the accessibility of manner expressions and the analyticity of languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251358549
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Birds Fly Differently Across Languages?—Manner Salience of Flight Events in English and Chinese

Shuzhen Jiang
1 links
SAGE Open
Categorization, perception, and language
article

How Birds Fly Differently Across Languages?—Manner Salience of Flight Events in English and Chinese

Shuzhen Jiang
article en

Abstract

The portrayal of motion events across languages has been extensively explored, typically focusing on human locomotion. This study, however, diverges from the norm by examining the representation of motion events associated with avian species. The research scrutinizes how motion events involving avian species are represented in English and Chinese, focusing on manner of motion. English utilizes a wider variety of specific manner verbs, often borrowing from adjacent categories, while Chinese relies more on basic manner verbs and manner adverbials. An additional exploration utilizing a parallel corpus highlights a prevalent reliance in Chinese on the basic manner verb 飞 fēi “fly.” Notably, disparity in manner salience in describing flight events emerge early in linguistic development, even in children’s lyrics. The factors contributing to the gap of manner salience include openness of manner category, the accessibility of manner expressions and the analyticity of languages.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(3)
Zhejiang University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Birds Fly Differently Across Languages?—Manner Salience of <i>Flight</i> Events in English and Chinese — Shuzhen Jiang · SAGE Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS