The impact of transportation equity on healthcare accessibility for children with asthma

• The two-step floating catchment area approach quantifies spatial accessibility. • Private vehicles are the most equitable mode for healthcare access. • Public transit and taxis fail to meet emergency healthcare visit travel needs. • Taxis provide an equitable option for non-emergency healthcare visits at a high fare. • The observed disparities in accessibility inform targeted policy measures. Equitable access to healthcare facilities is essential to quality of life. However, many vulnerable communities encounter barriers because transportation systems are not designed to serve all residents equally. These disparities are particularly significant for childhood asthma, a public health concern where timely care is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. This study addresses the gaps in understanding how various transportation modes, including public transit, private vehicles, and taxis, influence healthcare accessibility for children with asthma. Using data from 18,393 hospital visits in Calgary, Canada (2010–2021), we evaluate spatiotemporal accessibility across three travel modes, considering emergency and non-emergency healthcare visit scenarios with varying travel cost thresholds through a two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Horizontal equity is quantified using the Gini coefficient, while vertical equity incorporates socioeconomic factors and asthma prevalence. Our findings reveal that personal vehicles provide the highest and most reliable accessibility, especially during emergencies, whereas public transit frequently fails to meet emergency accessibility demands, particularly at night. Taxis tend to be unaffordable for low-income users but offer comparable accessibility for higher-income travelers in non-emergency contexts. The vertical equity analysis identifies areas characterized by high socioeconomic vulnerability, elevated asthma prevalence, and limited access to healthcare, highlighting zones that warrant targeted interventions to enhance equity in healthcare accessibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101616
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of transportation equity on healthcare accessibility for children with asthma

Merkebe Getachew Demissie, Anne Hicks, Laleh Behjat, Abebe Dress Beza et al.
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

The impact of transportation equity on healthcare accessibility for children with asthma

Merkebe Getachew Demissie, Anne Hicks, Laleh Behjat, Abebe Dress Beza, Mahnoush Minuyee
article en

Abstract

• The two-step floating catchment area approach quantifies spatial accessibility. • Private vehicles are the most equitable mode for healthcare access. • Public transit and taxis fail to meet emergency healthcare visit travel needs. • Taxis provide an equitable option for non-emergency healthcare visits at a high fare. • The observed disparities in accessibility inform targeted policy measures. Equitable access to healthcare facilities is essential to quality of life. However, many vulnerable communities encounter barriers because transportation systems are not designed to serve all residents equally. These disparities are particularly significant for childhood asthma, a public health concern where timely care is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. This study addresses the gaps in understanding how various transportation modes, including public transit, private vehicles, and taxis, influence healthcare accessibility for children with asthma. Using data from 18,393 hospital visits in Calgary, Canada (2010–2021), we evaluate spatiotemporal accessibility across three travel modes, considering emergency and non-emergency healthcare visit scenarios with varying travel cost thresholds through a two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Horizontal equity is quantified using the Gini coefficient, while vertical equity incorporates socioeconomic factors and asthma prevalence. Our findings reveal that personal vehicles provide the highest and most reliable accessibility, especially during emergencies, whereas public transit frequently fails to meet emergency accessibility demands, particularly at night. Taxis tend to be unaffordable for low-income users but offer comparable accessibility for higher-income travelers in non-emergency contexts. The vertical equity analysis identifies areas characterized by high socioeconomic vulnerability, elevated asthma prevalence, and limited access to healthcare, highlighting zones that warrant targeted interventions to enhance equity in healthcare accessibility.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 33
University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.