Placing Children in Residential Care: A Scoping Review of Decision‐Making and Matching Criteria

ABSTRACT Placement decisions in residential care (RC) represent one of the most challenging aspects of child protection services. While often framed as a last‐resort solution, RC aims to serve children whose needs are not met through family‐based interventions and is used differently across countries. This scoping review explores: (I) the factors influencing social workers' decisions to place children in RC and (II) the criteria considered to determine the most appropriate facility. A systematic search across seven databases yielded 10 relevant studies—seven focused on the first question and three on the second—analysed through thematic analysis and presented using the Decision‐Making Ecology framework. Findings highlight the centrality of the child's age and clinical characteristics, with national differences, and confirm the discretionary nature of the decision‐making process, shaped by professionals' prior experience, emotions and social support. Matching processes often rely on informal knowledge rather than structured, up‐to‐date assessments of RC units. Recurrent issues include cost considerations and limited information on residential facilities, while children's involvement is not always considered. The review identifies key CPS practices to guide the placement and matching process and calls for stronger inter‐professional collaboration and investment in applied research to support more coherent, child‐centred decision‐making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child & Family Social Work
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.70054
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Placing Children in Residential Care: A Scoping Review of Decision‐Making and Matching Criteria

Cristiano Monti
1 citations
Child & Family Social Work
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
article

Placing Children in Residential Care: A Scoping Review of Decision‐Making and Matching Criteria

Cristiano Monti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Placement decisions in residential care (RC) represent one of the most challenging aspects of child protection services. While often framed as a last‐resort solution, RC aims to serve children whose needs are not met through family‐based interventions and is used differently across countries. This scoping review explores: (I) the factors influencing social workers' decisions to place children in RC and (II) the criteria considered to determine the most appropriate facility. A systematic search across seven databases yielded 10 relevant studies—seven focused on the first question and three on the second—analysed through thematic analysis and presented using the Decision‐Making Ecology framework. Findings highlight the centrality of the child's age and clinical characteristics, with national differences, and confirm the discretionary nature of the decision‐making process, shaped by professionals' prior experience, emotions and social support. Matching processes often rely on informal knowledge rather than structured, up‐to‐date assessments of RC units. Recurrent issues include cost considerations and limited information on residential facilities, while children's involvement is not always considered. The review identifies key CPS practices to guide the placement and matching process and calls for stronger inter‐professional collaboration and investment in applied research to support more coherent, child‐centred decision‐making.

Child & Family Social Work
University of Bologna (IT)
Università di Bologna
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.