Driving Toward Carbon Neutrality in United States: Do Artificial Intelligence Shocks, Energy Policy Uncertainty, Green Growth, and Regulatory Quality Matter?

The issue of ecological degradation is evolving, presenting new challenges for both human existence and the ecosystem amid rising economic growth. Artificial intelligence (AI), as a transformative technological innovation, brings both opportunities and risks for environmental sustainability. This paper presents empirical evidence regarding the environmental costs and benefits of AI by analyzing its asymmetric impact on carbon emissions in the United States from the first quarter of 1996 to the fourth quarter of 2020. We employ a unique methodology that integrates nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL), wavelet time coherence (WTC), and Quantile on Quantile Kernel-Based Regularized Least Squares (QQKRLS) to investigate the influence of AI, energy policy uncertainty (EP), green growth (GG), and regulatory quality (RQ) on achieving carbon neutrality. The research indicates that artificial intelligence (AI) exerts a dual influence on the environment. On one hand, innovations driven by AI enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions; on the other hand, their high computational requirements and resource consumption contribute to an increase in carbon emissions. Significantly, the adverse effects of AI surpass its positive contributions, leading to a net increase in emissions without effective regulatory oversight. Nevertheless, RQ and GG are crucial in mitigating the negative environmental effects of AI, as regulatory measures can effectively counteract detrimental impacts and enhance positive outcomes. The robustness of these findings is supported by strong correlations identified through WTC and QQKRLS analyses. These results underscore the necessity for proactive regulatory frameworks that aim to optimize the environmental benefits of AI while minimizing its negative externalities, ensuring alignment with the US decarbonization strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251359735
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving Toward Carbon Neutrality in United States: Do Artificial Intelligence Shocks, Energy Policy Uncertainty, Green Growth, and Regulatory Quality Matter?

Abul Hassan, Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim
2 citations
SAGE Open
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
article

Driving Toward Carbon Neutrality in United States: Do Artificial Intelligence Shocks, Energy Policy Uncertainty, Green Growth, and Regulatory Quality Matter?

Abul Hassan, Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The issue of ecological degradation is evolving, presenting new challenges for both human existence and the ecosystem amid rising economic growth. Artificial intelligence (AI), as a transformative technological innovation, brings both opportunities and risks for environmental sustainability. This paper presents empirical evidence regarding the environmental costs and benefits of AI by analyzing its asymmetric impact on carbon emissions in the United States from the first quarter of 1996 to the fourth quarter of 2020. We employ a unique methodology that integrates nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL), wavelet time coherence (WTC), and Quantile on Quantile Kernel-Based Regularized Least Squares (QQKRLS) to investigate the influence of AI, energy policy uncertainty (EP), green growth (GG), and regulatory quality (RQ) on achieving carbon neutrality. The research indicates that artificial intelligence (AI) exerts a dual influence on the environment. On one hand, innovations driven by AI enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions; on the other hand, their high computational requirements and resource consumption contribute to an increase in carbon emissions. Significantly, the adverse effects of AI surpass its positive contributions, leading to a net increase in emissions without effective regulatory oversight. Nevertheless, RQ and GG are crucial in mitigating the negative environmental effects of AI, as regulatory measures can effectively counteract detrimental impacts and enhance positive outcomes. The robustness of these findings is supported by strong correlations identified through WTC and QQKRLS analyses. These results underscore the necessity for proactive regulatory frameworks that aim to optimize the environmental benefits of AI while minimizing its negative externalities, ensuring alignment with the US decarbonization strategy.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(3)
European University of Lefke (TR), University of Lagos (NG), King Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.