A Computerized Adaptive Approach to Measuring Faculty Assessment Literacy

The purpose of this study was to generate an item bank for assessing faculty members’ assessment literacy and to examine the applicability and feasibility of a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach to monitor assessment literacy among faculty members. In developing this assessment using a sequential mixed-methods research design, our goal was to create a simple, quick, and precise screening tool for assessing literacy in higher education. After defining the construct of assessment literacy within the higher education context, we developed the test blueprint and items, and subjected them to a series of expert reviews. Following a pilot administration to confirm feasibility, we conducted item parameter calibration using a representative sample of faculty members ( n = 211) selected through a convenience sampling approach. We evaluated the items for evidence of adequate psychometric quality, including fit, targeting, and unidimensionality under the Rasch framework. We concluded that developing an adaptive test for measuring assessment literacy is possible even with a small item pool and a small calibration sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251358101
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Computerized Adaptive Approach to Measuring Faculty Assessment Literacy

Beyza Aksu Dünya, Stefanie A. Wind, Mehmet Can Demir
SAGE Open
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

A Computerized Adaptive Approach to Measuring Faculty Assessment Literacy

Beyza Aksu Dünya, Stefanie A. Wind, Mehmet Can Demir
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to generate an item bank for assessing faculty members’ assessment literacy and to examine the applicability and feasibility of a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach to monitor assessment literacy among faculty members. In developing this assessment using a sequential mixed-methods research design, our goal was to create a simple, quick, and precise screening tool for assessing literacy in higher education. After defining the construct of assessment literacy within the higher education context, we developed the test blueprint and items, and subjected them to a series of expert reviews. Following a pilot administration to confirm feasibility, we conducted item parameter calibration using a representative sample of faculty members ( n = 211) selected through a convenience sampling approach. We evaluated the items for evidence of adequate psychometric quality, including fit, targeting, and unidimensionality under the Rasch framework. We concluded that developing an adaptive test for measuring assessment literacy is possible even with a small item pool and a small calibration sample.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(3)
University of Alabama (US), Bartin University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.