Goal Clarification and Process Feedback Matter: Reducing Test Anxiety in Low-Stakes Testing

Test anxiety can undermine student achievement and self-esteem, even with low-stakes tests designed to support learning. While previous research mainly focused on individual factors, an important question was whether aspects of the social context - how teachers interact with students about tests - can also reduce test anxiety. Grounded in assessment for learning and self-determination theory, this study investigated if goal clarification and process feedback - core instructional strategies in low-stakes contexts - relate to lower test anxiety via need satisfaction and need frustration. A pretest-posttest field study was conducted with 237 secondary school students. Two to five days before their low-stakes test, a pre-questionnaire measured students' baseline test anxiety, need-based experiences, and perceptions of goal clarification and process feedback. The post-questionnaire, completed immediately after the test, assessed students' experienced test anxiety. Multilevel analyses revealed that students who perceived more goal clarification and process feedback reported lower test anxiety, after accounting for baseline test anxiety and gender. Greater need satisfaction, but not lower need frustration, mediated these student-level relations. Moreover, classroom-level process feedback predicted decreased test anxiety. These findings suggest that providing more clarity on learning goals and more process feedback can alleviate test anxiety in low-stakes contexts, offering insights for targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Experimental Education
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2025.2549870
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goal Clarification and Process Feedback Matter: Reducing Test Anxiety in Low-Stakes Testing

S. De Jonge, Leen Haerens, Erika A. Patall, Evelien Opdecam
1 citations
The Journal of Experimental Education
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
3.25
article

Goal Clarification and Process Feedback Matter: Reducing Test Anxiety in Low-Stakes Testing

S. De Jonge, Leen Haerens, Erika A. Patall, Evelien Opdecam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Test anxiety can undermine student achievement and self-esteem, even with low-stakes tests designed to support learning. While previous research mainly focused on individual factors, an important question was whether aspects of the social context - how teachers interact with students about tests - can also reduce test anxiety. Grounded in assessment for learning and self-determination theory, this study investigated if goal clarification and process feedback - core instructional strategies in low-stakes contexts - relate to lower test anxiety via need satisfaction and need frustration. A pretest-posttest field study was conducted with 237 secondary school students. Two to five days before their low-stakes test, a pre-questionnaire measured students' baseline test anxiety, need-based experiences, and perceptions of goal clarification and process feedback. The post-questionnaire, completed immediately after the test, assessed students' experienced test anxiety. Multilevel analyses revealed that students who perceived more goal clarification and process feedback reported lower test anxiety, after accounting for baseline test anxiety and gender. Greater need satisfaction, but not lower need frustration, mediated these student-level relations. Moreover, classroom-level process feedback predicted decreased test anxiety. These findings suggest that providing more clarity on learning goals and more process feedback can alleviate test anxiety in low-stakes contexts, offering insights for targeted interventions.

The Journal of Experimental Education
University of Southern California (US), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.