The Architecture of Global Order: International Organizations, Governance Challenges, and the Test of Crisis (A Focus on UN, WTO, IMF, Regional Bodies, and WHO's COVID-19 Response)

This paper examines the crucial, yet often debated, roles of major International Organisations (IOs), particularly the United Nations (UN), the WTO, and the IMF, within the framework of modern global governance. Globalisation creates collective action problems that are highly complex, involving pandemics, climate change, and financial instability, that demand effective international cooperation. However, IOs face pressure from sovereignty concerns, geopolitical divisions, and internal inefficiencies. This study employs a qualitative research approach, reviewing peer-reviewed literature, IO institutional reports, and public policy documents to develop a conceptual framework for IOs and global governance. A detailed case study of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) response to COVID-19 carefully examines the competing demands and capacities of global health governance and multilateral collaboration. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that IOs are undeniably vital for global collective decision-making. Yet, it also highlights how IOs struggle with funding models and enforcement by member states. The paper further assesses regional organisations to determine whether they complement or compete with IOs. In other words, the findings offer insights into whether regional organisations exacerbate problems in global governance. Despite their importance in addressing global challenges, IOS often faces dysfunction, political divisions among members, and inequalities. The study concludes that existing institutions must be reformed or new models of cooperative engagement developed to ensure that IOs remain relevant in a fragmented yet interconnected world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Science and International Relations
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20250803.19
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Architecture of Global Order: International Organizations, Governance Challenges, and the Test of Crisis (A Focus on UN, WTO, IMF, Regional Bodies, and WHO's COVID-19 Response)

Emmanuel Okoh Agyemang
Journal of Political Science and International Relations
Global Security and Public Health
article

The Architecture of Global Order: International Organizations, Governance Challenges, and the Test of Crisis (A Focus on UN, WTO, IMF, Regional Bodies, and WHO's COVID-19 Response)

Emmanuel Okoh Agyemang
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the crucial, yet often debated, roles of major International Organisations (IOs), particularly the United Nations (UN), the WTO, and the IMF, within the framework of modern global governance. Globalisation creates collective action problems that are highly complex, involving pandemics, climate change, and financial instability, that demand effective international cooperation. However, IOs face pressure from sovereignty concerns, geopolitical divisions, and internal inefficiencies. This study employs a qualitative research approach, reviewing peer-reviewed literature, IO institutional reports, and public policy documents to develop a conceptual framework for IOs and global governance. A detailed case study of the World Health Organisation's (WHO) response to COVID-19 carefully examines the competing demands and capacities of global health governance and multilateral collaboration. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that IOs are undeniably vital for global collective decision-making. Yet, it also highlights how IOs struggle with funding models and enforcement by member states. The paper further assesses regional organisations to determine whether they complement or compete with IOs. In other words, the findings offer insights into whether regional organisations exacerbate problems in global governance. Despite their importance in addressing global challenges, IOS often faces dysfunction, political divisions among members, and inequalities. The study concludes that existing institutions must be reformed or new models of cooperative engagement developed to ensure that IOs remain relevant in a fragmented yet interconnected world.

Journal of Political Science and International RelationsVol. 8(3)
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.