Effect of different tennis court surfaces on the balance performance of tennis players

Background and Study Aim. Tennis is a high-paced sport that demands significant physical capabilities, including balance, which is crucial for maintaining stability and control during play. The surface on which tennis is played, such as hard or clay courts, can impact these performance aspects differently. This study aimed to investigate the effects of playing tennis on hard and clay courts on the dynamic and static balance performances of novice male tennis players (university students). Material and Methods. Fifteen novice male tennis players (age: 22.80 ± 1.33 years, height: 178.67 ± 7.30 cm, body weight: 73.00 ± 6.88 kg, body mass index: 22.88 ± 0.01%) participated in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to either a clay court or a hard court for the first testing session. The study employed a crossover design. Each testing session included dynamic (eyes open) and static (eyes closed) balance measurements. These were assessed using the Biodex Balance System (BBS) under both conditions. Measurements were conducted 15 minutes after the completion of a 1-hour standard tennis training session on each court surface. The entire study protocol was repeated three days after the first session, with the court surfaces reversed. Results. No significant differences were found in dynamic and static balance performances between the hard and clay courts. However, the static anterior-posterior stability index (APSI) on the clay court showed a significant difference (p = 0.035) in favor of dynamic balance. Conclusions. Dynamic balance on the clay court was generally superior to static balance, especially in the APSI parameter. The study findings suggest that the type of court surface does not significantly impact balance performance, with the exception of anterior-posterior balance on clay courts. These results highlight the potential importance of training on various surfaces to optimize balance and overall performance in tennis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Education of Students
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2025.0404
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of different tennis court surfaces on the balance performance of tennis players

Sedat Özcan, Elif Taşkuyu
Physical Education of Students
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effect of different tennis court surfaces on the balance performance of tennis players

Sedat Özcan, Elif Taşkuyu
article en

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. Tennis is a high-paced sport that demands significant physical capabilities, including balance, which is crucial for maintaining stability and control during play. The surface on which tennis is played, such as hard or clay courts, can impact these performance aspects differently. This study aimed to investigate the effects of playing tennis on hard and clay courts on the dynamic and static balance performances of novice male tennis players (university students). Material and Methods. Fifteen novice male tennis players (age: 22.80 ± 1.33 years, height: 178.67 ± 7.30 cm, body weight: 73.00 ± 6.88 kg, body mass index: 22.88 ± 0.01%) participated in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to either a clay court or a hard court for the first testing session. The study employed a crossover design. Each testing session included dynamic (eyes open) and static (eyes closed) balance measurements. These were assessed using the Biodex Balance System (BBS) under both conditions. Measurements were conducted 15 minutes after the completion of a 1-hour standard tennis training session on each court surface. The entire study protocol was repeated three days after the first session, with the court surfaces reversed. Results. No significant differences were found in dynamic and static balance performances between the hard and clay courts. However, the static anterior-posterior stability index (APSI) on the clay court showed a significant difference (p = 0.035) in favor of dynamic balance. Conclusions. Dynamic balance on the clay court was generally superior to static balance, especially in the APSI parameter. The study findings suggest that the type of court surface does not significantly impact balance performance, with the exception of anterior-posterior balance on clay courts. These results highlight the potential importance of training on various surfaces to optimize balance and overall performance in tennis.

Physical Education of StudentsVol. 29(4)
Akdeniz University Hospital (TR), Suleyman Demirel University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.