Is Second Grade a Zone of Instructional Development for Teachers? Rethinking Strategic Staffing With a Mixed-Methods Study of Elementary Principals’ Assignment Decisions

Prior research suggests that elementary school principals assign their strongest teachers to tested grades. As accountability frameworks have softened and principals’ experiences with them have matured, does the pattern still hold? We employ a convergent mixed-methods design to consider, at once, multiple explanations for how school leaders implement teacher assignments by combining data from surveys, interviews, and administrative records from North Carolina. Results reveal a reassignment pattern into second grade, with principals more likely to reassign teachers with lower scores on observation rubrics or value-added ratings to second grade than teachers with higher scores or ratings. Pushing beyond the literature that documents conventional notions of accountability-based staffing, we reveal a more nuanced story about how and why principals assign their teachers within schools.