Measuring Knowledge Vulnerabilities in Knowledge Processes: A Scale Development

The aim of this paper is to propose and test a new measuring scale for the concept of “knowledge vulnerabilities”. With this research, we are continuing our work on a research project concerning knowledge risks and knowledge vulnerabilities that can manifest in organizations, alongside knowledge processes. In the context of a scarce literature concerning knowledge vulnerabilities, this research adds value by understanding and measuring knowledge vulnerabilities, as weak points of the knowledge system and of the knowledge management routines that could trigger or facilitate the appearance of risks, exposing the organization to threats. In this paper, we present an instrument for measuring knowledge vulnerabilities related to the knowledge processes within an organization, in the form of a questionnaire. This instrument is developed starting from a previously tested instrument, with 21 items, proposed by Neștian and Guță (2023). The new instrument contains 42 items, with newly developed items reflecting a deeper understanding of knowledge vulnerabilities. The taxonomy for knowledge vulnerabilities is based on a recent perspective of organizational knowledge dynamics (Bratianu, Neștian and Guță, 2022). In this research, seven knowledge processes are considered and vulnerabilities related to them are proposed: vulnerabilities related to knowledge creation, vulnerabilities related to knowledge acquisition, vulnerabilities related to knowledge loss, vulnerabilities related to knowledge sharing, vulnerabilities related to knowledge use, vulnerabilities related to emotional knowledge dynamics and vulnerabilities related to spiritual knowledge dynamics. The questionnaire has been applied in private companies, on both managers and non-managers. Principal components analysis was undertaken to highlight the components forming the construct of vulnerabilities related to knowledge processes. The factors resulting from applying the statistical method of principal components analysis on the data collected with this improved questionnaire are composed starting from a larger number of items and are better aligned with the theoretical perspective used, compared with the questionnaire developed in 2023 by Neștian and Guță. The items of the questionnaire loaded in the principal components can be used for relevant future studies on knowledge vulnerabilities. The resulting components offer a better picture regarding the conceptualization of the notion of vulnerabilities associated with knowledge processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Conference on Knowledge Management
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.26.1.3773
Primary Topic
Organizational and Employee Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Knowledge Vulnerabilities in Knowledge Processes: A Scale Development

Alexandra Luciana Guță, Andrei Ștefan Neştian, Constantin Brătianu, Silviu-Mihail Tiţă
European Conference on Knowledge Management
Organizational and Employee Performance
article

Measuring Knowledge Vulnerabilities in Knowledge Processes: A Scale Development

Alexandra Luciana Guță, Andrei Ștefan Neştian, Constantin Brătianu, Silviu-Mihail Tiţă
article en

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose and test a new measuring scale for the concept of “knowledge vulnerabilities”. With this research, we are continuing our work on a research project concerning knowledge risks and knowledge vulnerabilities that can manifest in organizations, alongside knowledge processes. In the context of a scarce literature concerning knowledge vulnerabilities, this research adds value by understanding and measuring knowledge vulnerabilities, as weak points of the knowledge system and of the knowledge management routines that could trigger or facilitate the appearance of risks, exposing the organization to threats. In this paper, we present an instrument for measuring knowledge vulnerabilities related to the knowledge processes within an organization, in the form of a questionnaire. This instrument is developed starting from a previously tested instrument, with 21 items, proposed by Neștian and Guță (2023). The new instrument contains 42 items, with newly developed items reflecting a deeper understanding of knowledge vulnerabilities. The taxonomy for knowledge vulnerabilities is based on a recent perspective of organizational knowledge dynamics (Bratianu, Neștian and Guță, 2022). In this research, seven knowledge processes are considered and vulnerabilities related to them are proposed: vulnerabilities related to knowledge creation, vulnerabilities related to knowledge acquisition, vulnerabilities related to knowledge loss, vulnerabilities related to knowledge sharing, vulnerabilities related to knowledge use, vulnerabilities related to emotional knowledge dynamics and vulnerabilities related to spiritual knowledge dynamics. The questionnaire has been applied in private companies, on both managers and non-managers. Principal components analysis was undertaken to highlight the components forming the construct of vulnerabilities related to knowledge processes. The factors resulting from applying the statistical method of principal components analysis on the data collected with this improved questionnaire are composed starting from a larger number of items and are better aligned with the theoretical perspective used, compared with the questionnaire developed in 2023 by Neștian and Guță. The items of the questionnaire loaded in the principal components can be used for relevant future studies on knowledge vulnerabilities. The resulting components offer a better picture regarding the conceptualization of the notion of vulnerabilities associated with knowledge processes.

European Conference on Knowledge ManagementVol. 26(1)
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Organizational and Employee Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.