Clinical effectiveness of switching to right lateral orbitofrontal cortex-TMS after failure of sequential bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal-TMS in major depression

Background: When patients with major depression fail to respond to TMS using a conventional dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) protocol, several published case series have suggested that switching to or adding-on 1 Hz right lateral orbitofrontal cortex (R-LOFC) TMS may succeed.However, many of these case series are hampered by relatively short courses of treatment (i.e., <25 sessions) for either the DLPFC, the R-LOFC, or both protocols.Methods: Here we report clinical outcomes for a case series of N=54 patients in a community setting who underwent a full course of 36 sessions of sequential bilateral (SBL) DLPFC-TMS (right/left, 1Hz/20Hz, 60s on 30s off/2s on 4s off, 360 pulses/1200 pulses, both 120% RMT) without response, then completed a full course of another 36 sessions of 1 Hz-R-LOFC-TMS (1Hz, 60s on 30s off, 360 pulses).Results: Following the R-LOFC course, 15/54 (27.8%) achieved response and 9/54 (16.7%) achieved remission on PHQ-9, with a mean score improving from 14.24.1 to 9.55.3points.Responders showed a distinctive discontinuity in response trajectory immediately following the switch from DLPFC to R-LOFC, with a significant sharp drop in symptoms suggesting causal effect. Conclusion:Switching to 1 Hz-R-LOFC-TMS yields a sharp change in response trajectory in a subset of SBL-DLPFC-TMS unresponsive patients, implying a distinctive therapeutic mechanism rather than the accumulative effects of additional sessions.Future randomized controlled studies may establish definitive efficacy for 1 Hz-R-LOFC-TMS in depression among non-responders to conventional DLPFC-TMS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transcranial magnetic stimulation .
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transm.2025.100190
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical effectiveness of switching to right lateral orbitofrontal cortex-TMS after failure of sequential bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal-TMS in major depression

Victoria J. Middleton, Alexander T. Sack, Nikita van der Vinne, Martijn Arns et al.
1 links
Transcranial magnetic stimulation .
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Clinical effectiveness of switching to right lateral orbitofrontal cortex-TMS after failure of sequential bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal-TMS in major depression

Victoria J. Middleton, Alexander T. Sack, Nikita van der Vinne, Martijn Arns, Jonathan H. Downar, Joseph Kriske, John Kriske, Nancy Donachie, Jenny Bowman, Amourie Prentice
article en

Abstract

Background: When patients with major depression fail to respond to TMS using a conventional dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) protocol, several published case series have suggested that switching to or adding-on 1 Hz right lateral orbitofrontal cortex (R-LOFC) TMS may succeed.However, many of these case series are hampered by relatively short courses of treatment (i.e., <25 sessions) for either the DLPFC, the R-LOFC, or both protocols.Methods: Here we report clinical outcomes for a case series of N=54 patients in a community setting who underwent a full course of 36 sessions of sequential bilateral (SBL) DLPFC-TMS (right/left, 1Hz/20Hz, 60s on 30s off/2s on 4s off, 360 pulses/1200 pulses, both 120% RMT) without response, then completed a full course of another 36 sessions of 1 Hz-R-LOFC-TMS (1Hz, 60s on 30s off, 360 pulses).Results: Following the R-LOFC course, 15/54 (27.8%) achieved response and 9/54 (16.7%) achieved remission on PHQ-9, with a mean score improving from 14.24.1 to 9.55.3points.Responders showed a distinctive discontinuity in response trajectory immediately following the switch from DLPFC to R-LOFC, with a significant sharp drop in symptoms suggesting causal effect. Conclusion:Switching to 1 Hz-R-LOFC-TMS yields a sharp change in response trajectory in a subset of SBL-DLPFC-TMS unresponsive patients, implying a distinctive therapeutic mechanism rather than the accumulative effects of additional sessions.Future randomized controlled studies may establish definitive efficacy for 1 Hz-R-LOFC-TMS in depression among non-responders to conventional DLPFC-TMS.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation .Vol. 5
University of Toronto (CA), Maastricht University (NL), Brainclinics (NL), Stanford University (US)
Fondation Brain Canada, National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.