Hybrid and Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Axial Load Capacity in Rectangular CFST Stub Columns

Concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns are widely utilized in Structural Engineering because of their outstanding Load-Bearing Capacity (LBC) and ductility. Current design codes offer inconsistent predictions for Axial Load Capacity (ALC), particularly for high-strength Rectangular CFST Stub Columns (R-CFST columns), leading to uncertainty in practical applications. This study addresses this gap by developing interpretable and accurate Machine Learning (ML) models for predicting the ALC of such columns. A Database of 719 experimental results was compiled, encompassing six input features related to geometry and material properties. The core ML algorithm used is Histogram Gradient Boosting Regression (HGBR), which is further enhanced using two metaheuristic optimization algorithms: the Lotus Effect Optimization Algorithm (LEOA) and the Emperor Penguin Optimization Algorithm (EPOA). An ensemble strategy based on Dempster–Shafer theory (D–S theory) is also proposed. Model performance is evaluated using R², RMSE, MSE, MRAE, and RSR metrics. The hybrid HGBR–LEOA model (HGLA) achieved the best performance with R² = 0.9933 and RMSE = 202.728 in the test set. A sensitivity analysis using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) identified Wall Thickness (t) and Section Width (B) as the most influential features. The outcomes illustrate that the suggested ML models significantly outperform traditional design code predictions and offer a fast, reliable alternative for early-stage structural design. This document provides a practical, data-driven framework that bridges the gap between empirical behavior and design code limitations for R-CFST columns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.24833
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid and Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Axial Load Capacity in Rectangular CFST Stub Columns

Zhibo Wang
1 citations
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
0.95
article

Hybrid and Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Axial Load Capacity in Rectangular CFST Stub Columns

Zhibo Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns are widely utilized in Structural Engineering because of their outstanding Load-Bearing Capacity (LBC) and ductility. Current design codes offer inconsistent predictions for Axial Load Capacity (ALC), particularly for high-strength Rectangular CFST Stub Columns (R-CFST columns), leading to uncertainty in practical applications. This study addresses this gap by developing interpretable and accurate Machine Learning (ML) models for predicting the ALC of such columns. A Database of 719 experimental results was compiled, encompassing six input features related to geometry and material properties. The core ML algorithm used is Histogram Gradient Boosting Regression (HGBR), which is further enhanced using two metaheuristic optimization algorithms: the Lotus Effect Optimization Algorithm (LEOA) and the Emperor Penguin Optimization Algorithm (EPOA). An ensemble strategy based on Dempster–Shafer theory (D–S theory) is also proposed. Model performance is evaluated using R², RMSE, MSE, MRAE, and RSR metrics. The hybrid HGBR–LEOA model (HGLA) achieved the best performance with R² = 0.9933 and RMSE = 202.728 in the test set. A sensitivity analysis using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) identified Wall Thickness (t) and Section Width (B) as the most influential features. The outcomes illustrate that the suggested ML models significantly outperform traditional design code predictions and offer a fast, reliable alternative for early-stage structural design. This document provides a practical, data-driven framework that bridges the gap between empirical behavior and design code limitations for R-CFST columns.

Electronic Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 25(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.