Positioning in discourse about religious belief and practice in superdiverse contexts

Religious beliefs and practices can and do shift depending on the context of the religious believer, and how they talk about those beliefs and practices may change depending on that context. This article focuses on how religious people position their religious beliefs and practices, and how the use and understanding of those religious positions can shift depending on contextual factors. It aims to present a method for analysing these shifts, using positioning theory and close discourse analysis. The conclusion argues that analysis of the dynamics of religious positioning has consequences for how religious belief is talked about and understood in contemporary society, how power is exercised in interaction about religion, and how people of different religious faiths and backgrounds come to understand one another and people of no faith in superdiverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Compass
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686251361004
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positioning in discourse about religious belief and practice in superdiverse contexts

Stephen Pihlaja
Social Compass
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Positioning in discourse about religious belief and practice in superdiverse contexts

Stephen Pihlaja
article en

Abstract

Religious beliefs and practices can and do shift depending on the context of the religious believer, and how they talk about those beliefs and practices may change depending on that context. This article focuses on how religious people position their religious beliefs and practices, and how the use and understanding of those religious positions can shift depending on contextual factors. It aims to present a method for analysing these shifts, using positioning theory and close discourse analysis. The conclusion argues that analysis of the dynamics of religious positioning has consequences for how religious belief is talked about and understood in contemporary society, how power is exercised in interaction about religion, and how people of different religious faiths and backgrounds come to understand one another and people of no faith in superdiverse settings.

Social CompassVol. 72(3)
Aston University (GB)
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.