Examining the Effects of New York’s Bail Law on Pretrial Recidivism: A Controlled-Interrupted Time Series Analysis

In January 2020, New York implemented a bail reform law restricting judges’ discretion to set money bail for certain offense types. We used a controlled-interrupted time series (CITS) design to estimate the reform’s impact on pretrial recidivism. Leveraging the reform’s offense-based eligibility criteria, defendants were separated into treatment and control groups. By comparing recidivism pre- and post-reform and between the treatment and control groups, we were able to minimize confounding from coinciding changes. We evaluated the new law’s effect on multiple recidivism measures: any re-arrest, felony re-arrest, and violent felony re-arrest. In addition, we conducted subgroup analyses for high-risk defendants with recent criminal history. We found a statistically significant increase in violent felony re-arrests among the subgroup of individuals with recent criminal history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034251363835
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Effects of New York’s Bail Law on Pretrial Recidivism: A Controlled-Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Stephen Koppel, René Ropac
1 citations
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Crime Patterns and Interventions
4.20
article

Examining the Effects of New York’s Bail Law on Pretrial Recidivism: A Controlled-Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Stephen Koppel, René Ropac
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In January 2020, New York implemented a bail reform law restricting judges’ discretion to set money bail for certain offense types. We used a controlled-interrupted time series (CITS) design to estimate the reform’s impact on pretrial recidivism. Leveraging the reform’s offense-based eligibility criteria, defendants were separated into treatment and control groups. By comparing recidivism pre- and post-reform and between the treatment and control groups, we were able to minimize confounding from coinciding changes. We evaluated the new law’s effect on multiple recidivism measures: any re-arrest, felony re-arrest, and violent felony re-arrest. In addition, we conducted subgroup analyses for high-risk defendants with recent criminal history. We found a statistically significant increase in violent felony re-arrests among the subgroup of individuals with recent criminal history.

Criminal Justice Policy ReviewVol. 37(1)
John Jay College of Criminal Justice (US)
Arnold Ventures
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.