The Next Frontier of Cybercrime Law for Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability

Artificial intelligence (AI) is spreading rapidly in society, but criminal law still mainly deals with human actions. This research looks at how AI systems challenge basic ideas in criminal law, such as intention (mens rea), action (actus reus), and causation. Unlike humans, AI can act on its own, learn from data, and sometimes cause harm without direct human control. Current laws are not fully able to handle situations where AI creates or helps in criminal acts. By studying recent cases, proposed laws, and legal theories, this research shows major gaps in existing rules. It argues that new legal frameworks are needed to deal with different levels of AI independence. Suggested solutions include shared responsibility models, stronger corporate liability, and clear rules for AI design and use. These ideas are important not only for cybercrime but also for areas like self-driving cars, medical AI, and automated decision-making

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Policy
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.355
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Next Frontier of Cybercrime Law for Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability

Sadia Sattar
International Journal of Law and Policy
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

The Next Frontier of Cybercrime Law for Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability

Sadia Sattar
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is spreading rapidly in society, but criminal law still mainly deals with human actions. This research looks at how AI systems challenge basic ideas in criminal law, such as intention (mens rea), action (actus reus), and causation. Unlike humans, AI can act on its own, learn from data, and sometimes cause harm without direct human control. Current laws are not fully able to handle situations where AI creates or helps in criminal acts. By studying recent cases, proposed laws, and legal theories, this research shows major gaps in existing rules. It argues that new legal frameworks are needed to deal with different levels of AI independence. Suggested solutions include shared responsibility models, stronger corporate liability, and clear rules for AI design and use. These ideas are important not only for cybercrime but also for areas like self-driving cars, medical AI, and automated decision-making

International Journal of Law and PolicyVol. 3(8)
Lahore Leads University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Next Frontier of Cybercrime Law for Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability — Sadia Sattar · International Journal of Law and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS