Risk, reward and loss in addictive behavior: a six-year cross-lagged panel study

Decision making in the context of addiction is characterized by altered values regarding risk and reward, but the long-term and reciprocal relationship between value-based decision-making and addictive behavior remains poorly understood. In this study, 338 individuals (19-27 years, 59% female) from a community sample participated in a baseline assessment, including clinical interviews on addictive behaviors (quantity of use, frequency of use, DSM-5 criteria) and a task battery to assess four facets of value-based decision-making (delay aversion, risk-seeking for gains and losses, and loss aversion). Follow-up assessments were conducted after 3 and 6 years, with 75% and 71% of participants retained, respectively. Using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM) controlled for age, gender, IQ, and the baseline addiction level, we examined the bidirectional relationships between value-based decision-making and addictive behavior. Our findings demonstrate temporal stability in both decision-making and addictive behavior, but provide limited evidence for predictive cross-lagged relationships. While prior research indicates that altered value-based decision-making is a predictor of addictive behavior, our findings suggest that its impact may be more limited or context-dependent, highlighting the importance of multifaceted approaches to understanding addiction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17826-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk, reward and loss in addictive behavior: a six-year cross-lagged panel study

Anja Kräplin, Juliane H. Fröhner, Thomas Goschke, Michael N. Smolka et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
2.71
article

Risk, reward and loss in addictive behavior: a six-year cross-lagged panel study

Anja Kräplin, Juliane H. Fröhner, Thomas Goschke, Michael N. Smolka, Mohsen Joshanloo, Gerhard Bühringer, Christian Baeuchl
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Decision making in the context of addiction is characterized by altered values regarding risk and reward, but the long-term and reciprocal relationship between value-based decision-making and addictive behavior remains poorly understood. In this study, 338 individuals (19-27 years, 59% female) from a community sample participated in a baseline assessment, including clinical interviews on addictive behaviors (quantity of use, frequency of use, DSM-5 criteria) and a task battery to assess four facets of value-based decision-making (delay aversion, risk-seeking for gains and losses, and loss aversion). Follow-up assessments were conducted after 3 and 6 years, with 75% and 71% of participants retained, respectively. Using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM) controlled for age, gender, IQ, and the baseline addiction level, we examined the bidirectional relationships between value-based decision-making and addictive behavior. Our findings demonstrate temporal stability in both decision-making and addictive behavior, but provide limited evidence for predictive cross-lagged relationships. While prior research indicates that altered value-based decision-making is a predictor of addictive behavior, our findings suggest that its impact may be more limited or context-dependent, highlighting the importance of multifaceted approaches to understanding addiction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Health Solutions (Sweden) (SE), Keimyung University (KR), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität Dresden
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.