Artificial intelligence for TB education and counselling: a modified Delphi consensus
<sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>Optimal TB care and control requires improved health education and effective patient counselling. Effective counselling is a lengthy process that requires addressing all questions related to TB transmission, risk, the disease process, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. We evaluated the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot responses, compared to global expert opinion.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>We configured an AI chatbot (TB counselling assistant [TBCA]) based on GPT-4. It was designed to draw information from reputable TB guidelines and tasked to provide educational responses. We tested the TBCA on 39 questions frequently asked by people with TB and their caregivers. Responses were appraised for quality by global TB experts using a modified Delphi consensus approach.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>Ninety-four experts were invited to participate, of whom 91 (96.8%) participated. Overall, the TBCA provided accurate answers to questions in all relevant domains, including epidemiology, clinical presentation, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as special considerations in vulnerable populations, while citing its information sources. When appropriate, it consistently directed the individual to seek advice from an appropriate health care provider. At times, the information provided was out of date (e.g., the definition of multidrug-resistant TB). It also struggled to distinguish diagnostic tests for TB infection and disease.</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title>Large language models can provide accurate responses to general TB questions, but the information provided may be out of date, or lack context. Although the advice provided was generally safe and helpful, health care professionals remain crucial to ensure advice is up to date and appropriate to the individual's unique circumstances.</sec>.
Authors
- Hendrik Simon Schaaf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-4133)
- Anh Tuan Dinh‐Xuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-5176)
- Justin T. Denholm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-6431)
- Onno W. Akkerman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-9260)
- Lia D’Ambrosio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-5777)
- Rosella Centis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8551-3598)
- Ong C (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-0451)
- Emanuele Pontali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1085-0442)
- Giovanni Battista Migliori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-574X)
- Delia Goletti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-4376)
- Matthew Chung Yi Koh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7374-8207)
- Alberto L. García‐Basteiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-5505)
- Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-7281)
- M. Munoz Torrico
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation (ZA)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera (IT)
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT)
- Hôpital Cochin (FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Center for Prevention and Treatment of Infections (US)
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (MX)
- Peter Doherty Institute (AU)
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES)
- National University Health System (SG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
- Published
- 2025-08-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.25.0086
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00