The Interpersonal Context of Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: A Focus on Relationship Quality

Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD) is a prevalent, yet under-researched condition that disrupts daily functioning, sexual well-being, and intimate relationships. While relationship variables are thought to influence pain experiences in chronic GPPPD, the existing literature regarding relationship satisfaction and pain intensity yields mixed findings. Furthermore, little is known about how specific partner behaviours impact these associations. This study aims to address these gaps by examining whether relationship satisfaction predicts pain-related outcomes, and whether partner responses to pain moderate these relationships in a diverse sample of individuals with GPPPD. Archival data were examined from the first timepoint of a longitudinal online study on GPPPD, restricted to participants in relationships who completed all relevant measures (n = 69). Participants reported current pain intensity (10-point numerical rating scale), relationship satisfaction (Couple Satisfaction Index-16), physiological anxiety (Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20), pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire), and partner responses to pain (modified West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory). Regression analyses in SPSS assessed direct and moderating effects. Results showed that relationship satisfaction significantly negatively predicted pain intensity and physiological anxiety, and positively predicted pain willingness (subscale of pain acceptance). Solicitous partner responses were also associated with reduced distress regarding one’s pain. Additionally, a significant moderation effect was identified such that the negative association between relationship satisfaction and pain intensity was greater when solicitous responses were high, a pattern that conflicts with prior literature suggesting solicitous behaviours exacerbate pain. These findings suggest that in the context of satisfying relationships, solicitous partner behaviours may offer positive benefits. Clinically, this highlights the importance of integrating couple-based approaches into GPPPD treatments, targeting both relational satisfaction and constructive solicitous behaviours. By clarifying how relational and behavioural factors interact in GPPPD, this research provides actionable treatment targets and opens new avenues for improving sexual health and quality of life in affected individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/iqurcp19840
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Interpersonal Context of Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: A Focus on Relationship Quality

Caroline F. Pukall, Melody Garas, Dorsa Tavakoli
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

The Interpersonal Context of Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder: A Focus on Relationship Quality

Caroline F. Pukall, Melody Garas, Dorsa Tavakoli
article en

Abstract

Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD) is a prevalent, yet under-researched condition that disrupts daily functioning, sexual well-being, and intimate relationships. While relationship variables are thought to influence pain experiences in chronic GPPPD, the existing literature regarding relationship satisfaction and pain intensity yields mixed findings. Furthermore, little is known about how specific partner behaviours impact these associations. This study aims to address these gaps by examining whether relationship satisfaction predicts pain-related outcomes, and whether partner responses to pain moderate these relationships in a diverse sample of individuals with GPPPD. Archival data were examined from the first timepoint of a longitudinal online study on GPPPD, restricted to participants in relationships who completed all relevant measures (n = 69). Participants reported current pain intensity (10-point numerical rating scale), relationship satisfaction (Couple Satisfaction Index-16), physiological anxiety (Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20), pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire), and partner responses to pain (modified West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory). Regression analyses in SPSS assessed direct and moderating effects. Results showed that relationship satisfaction significantly negatively predicted pain intensity and physiological anxiety, and positively predicted pain willingness (subscale of pain acceptance). Solicitous partner responses were also associated with reduced distress regarding one’s pain. Additionally, a significant moderation effect was identified such that the negative association between relationship satisfaction and pain intensity was greater when solicitous responses were high, a pattern that conflicts with prior literature suggesting solicitous behaviours exacerbate pain. These findings suggest that in the context of satisfying relationships, solicitous partner behaviours may offer positive benefits. Clinically, this highlights the importance of integrating couple-based approaches into GPPPD treatments, targeting both relational satisfaction and constructive solicitous behaviours. By clarifying how relational and behavioural factors interact in GPPPD, this research provides actionable treatment targets and opens new avenues for improving sexual health and quality of life in affected individuals.

Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsVol. 19(2)
Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.