Establishing assessment criteria for soil bioindicators: insights from case studies in Europe

• EU Soil Monitoring bioindicator data needs robust assessment criteria. • Criteria development requires dedicated sampling strategies and standardized protocols. • Harmonization of soil unit classifications should further coordinated assessment. The new EU Soil Strategy aims to restore soil health across Europe by 2050, requiring policy-relevant indicators with robust assessment criteria to control and monitor its achievement. Despite the importance of biological conditions for soil health, few EU Member States have currently established criteria (e.g., target or threshold values) for evaluation of monitoring data. Our study examines the challenges and opportunities in developing such criteria based on the normal operating ranges of bioindicators in the context of soil units (i.e., homogenous soil texture and land use). Leveraging on national case studies across Europe, we find that for most bioindicators criteria could not be defined, due to data insufficiency and environmental bias. Only in France could normal operating ranges be established for earthworms, for some soil units. We identify priorities for the development of robust assessment criteria: (1) Harmonization of evaluation units and definitions, to minimize disparities in current soil texture and land use classifications between Member States, that complicate comparability of evaluation across Europe; (2) Inclusion of climatic-region specific thresholds/targets in addition to land use and soil texture; and (3) Standardization of protocols to reduce the observed variability in methods for sampling and data aggregation. As a temporary solution to optimize monitoring sampling efforts, guidelines for dealing with data deficiencies and pseudo-replication are proposed. On the longer term, our findings highlight the importance of integrated data systems and standardised frameworks for monitoring bioindicators to evaluate progress towards achievement of the EU soil health targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114063
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing assessment criteria for soil bioindicators: insights from case studies in Europe

Viola Kurm, G.W. Korthals, Antonio Bispo, Carmen Trasar-Cepeda et al.
3 citations
Ecological Indicators
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
9.08
article

Establishing assessment criteria for soil bioindicators: insights from case studies in Europe

Viola Kurm, G.W. Korthals, Antonio Bispo, Carmen Trasar-Cepeda, Gilberto Bragato, Cristina Aponte, Florian Gschwend, Ferran Romero, G. Pérès, Elena Tondini, Laura Riggi, L. D’Avino, Johann G. Zaller, Stéfano Mocali, Maria Viketoft, D. Cluzeau, J.H. Faber, Anna Edlinger, Marion Mittmannsgruber, G. Guegan, N. Gronchi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• EU Soil Monitoring bioindicator data needs robust assessment criteria. • Criteria development requires dedicated sampling strategies and standardized protocols. • Harmonization of soil unit classifications should further coordinated assessment. The new EU Soil Strategy aims to restore soil health across Europe by 2050, requiring policy-relevant indicators with robust assessment criteria to control and monitor its achievement. Despite the importance of biological conditions for soil health, few EU Member States have currently established criteria (e.g., target or threshold values) for evaluation of monitoring data. Our study examines the challenges and opportunities in developing such criteria based on the normal operating ranges of bioindicators in the context of soil units (i.e., homogenous soil texture and land use). Leveraging on national case studies across Europe, we find that for most bioindicators criteria could not be defined, due to data insufficiency and environmental bias. Only in France could normal operating ranges be established for earthworms, for some soil units. We identify priorities for the development of robust assessment criteria: (1) Harmonization of evaluation units and definitions, to minimize disparities in current soil texture and land use classifications between Member States, that complicate comparability of evaluation across Europe; (2) Inclusion of climatic-region specific thresholds/targets in addition to land use and soil texture; and (3) Standardization of protocols to reduce the observed variability in methods for sampling and data aggregation. As a temporary solution to optimize monitoring sampling efforts, guidelines for dealing with data deficiencies and pseudo-replication are proposed. On the longer term, our findings highlight the importance of integrated data systems and standardised frameworks for monitoring bioindicators to evaluate progress towards achievement of the EU soil health targets.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 178
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), University of Zurich (CH), AgroParisTech (FR), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution (FR), Cereal Research Centre (IT), Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences (NL), Ecologie fonctionnelle & biogéochimie des sols & des agro-systèmes (FR), Misión Biológica de Galicia (ES), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (ES), Agroscope (CH), Institute of Zoology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Université de Rennes (FR), Wageningen University & Research (NL), BOKU University (AT)
European Commission, H2020 European Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.