Beyond Nature‐based Solutions: The case for Integrated Nature‐Climate Action

Abstract Nature‐based Solutions (NbS) have been gaining prominence across the Rio Conventions primarily as a means of addressing climate change with co‐benefits for nature and humans. However, they have also faced significant criticism for enabling greenwashing, encouraging market‐driven approaches and not addressing the root causes of environmental degradation. Some critics argue that NbS divert attention from urgent transformative actions such as decarbonisation and systemic economic reforms. We present the case for a broader framework, centred around the concept of Integrated Nature‐Climate Action (INCA), which extends beyond NbS to drive the structural changes essential for tackling climate change, biodiversity loss and desertification, while delivering positive outcomes such as supporting livelihoods, addressing inequities and upholding the rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. We provide examples of INCAs with significant, tractable benefits for people and nature, including the removal of environmentally harmful subsidies, land rights recognition and circular economic transitions. We argue that the wide range of actors mobilised by INCAs would increase the finance available to fill the deficit for climate and biodiversity action. While tracking the impact of these actions could be challenging, existing United Nations (UN) initiatives could provide models for ensuring the integrity of INCA. A clear definition and set of standards must also be agreed upon to avoid the pitfalls that plague NbS. Careful oversight from stakeholders and rightsholders is vital to ensure legitimacy and that the uptake of INCA does not favour one outcome over others. Policy implications : Moving beyond NbS to pursue an inclusive INCA concept can help address the systemic drivers of the global polycrisis. With synergies between the Rio Conventions expected to be a key focus of the upcoming Conference of the Parties for the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP30), there is a clear policy window to broaden the scope of interventions relevant to all three conventions and engage a more diverse array of actors to support enhanced coordination. This is essential for transitioning towards a regenerative economic system that works for people and the planet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70130
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Nature‐based Solutions: The case for Integrated Nature‐Climate Action

Ines Dombrowsky, Dawn R. Bazely, Nathalie Pettorelli, Tarra L. Penney et al.
3 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
3.32
article

Beyond Nature‐based Solutions: The case for Integrated Nature‐Climate Action

Ines Dombrowsky, Dawn R. Bazely, Nathalie Pettorelli, Tarra L. Penney, Hollie Folkard‐Tapp, Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Angele Alook, Fidele Ruzigandekwe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Nature‐based Solutions (NbS) have been gaining prominence across the Rio Conventions primarily as a means of addressing climate change with co‐benefits for nature and humans. However, they have also faced significant criticism for enabling greenwashing, encouraging market‐driven approaches and not addressing the root causes of environmental degradation. Some critics argue that NbS divert attention from urgent transformative actions such as decarbonisation and systemic economic reforms. We present the case for a broader framework, centred around the concept of Integrated Nature‐Climate Action (INCA), which extends beyond NbS to drive the structural changes essential for tackling climate change, biodiversity loss and desertification, while delivering positive outcomes such as supporting livelihoods, addressing inequities and upholding the rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. We provide examples of INCAs with significant, tractable benefits for people and nature, including the removal of environmentally harmful subsidies, land rights recognition and circular economic transitions. We argue that the wide range of actors mobilised by INCAs would increase the finance available to fill the deficit for climate and biodiversity action. While tracking the impact of these actions could be challenging, existing United Nations (UN) initiatives could provide models for ensuring the integrity of INCA. A clear definition and set of standards must also be agreed upon to avoid the pitfalls that plague NbS. Careful oversight from stakeholders and rightsholders is vital to ensure legitimacy and that the uptake of INCA does not favour one outcome over others. Policy implications : Moving beyond NbS to pursue an inclusive INCA concept can help address the systemic drivers of the global polycrisis. With synergies between the Rio Conventions expected to be a key focus of the upcoming Conference of the Parties for the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP30), there is a clear policy window to broaden the scope of interventions relevant to all three conventions and engage a more diverse array of actors to support enhanced coordination. This is essential for transitioning towards a regenerative economic system that works for people and the planet.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(10)
Zoological Society of London (GB), German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), York University (CA), Gender Studies (CZ), Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes (CA), Centre for Global Health Research (CA), Campbell Collaboration (NO), University College London (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Research England
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.