A inteligência artificial, normatização e o risco de atribuição decisória equivocada às máquinas

This paper analyzes the impact of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Brazilian law, focusing on judicial decisions and the regulations promoted by the National Council of Justice (CNJ) through Resolutions No. 332/2020 and No. 615/2025. The study seeks to understand the risks of algorithmic biases, the attribution of decision-making functions to machines, and cyber vulnerability within the Federal Supreme Court (STF), in light of the Federal Constitution, the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), and the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet. The research demonstrates that, although AI is essential for modernization and procedural speed, its use requires mechanisms of governance, transparency, and human accountability. The analysis highlights that technology should serve as an auxiliary tool, never a substitute for the judicial function, in order to guarantee the principles of due process, impartiality, and legal certainty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1310
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A inteligência artificial, normatização e o risco de atribuição decisória equivocada às máquinas

Paulo Queiroz, Dione Day Maria Pires Chaves, Elival Tomaz Santos Júnior
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

A inteligência artificial, normatização e o risco de atribuição decisória equivocada às máquinas

Paulo Queiroz, Dione Day Maria Pires Chaves, Elival Tomaz Santos Júnior
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Brazilian law, focusing on judicial decisions and the regulations promoted by the National Council of Justice (CNJ) through Resolutions No. 332/2020 and No. 615/2025. The study seeks to understand the risks of algorithmic biases, the attribution of decision-making functions to machines, and cyber vulnerability within the Federal Supreme Court (STF), in light of the Federal Constitution, the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), and the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet. The research demonstrates that, although AI is essential for modernization and procedural speed, its use requires mechanisms of governance, transparency, and human accountability. The analysis highlights that technology should serve as an auxiliary tool, never a substitute for the judicial function, in order to guarantee the principles of due process, impartiality, and legal certainty.

RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O SaberVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.