Geoeconomic fragmentation and the role of non-aligned countries

We analyze how non-aligned countries affect welfare outcomes in scenarios of global trade fragmentation. Using a quantitative trade model covering 141 countries and 65 economic sectors, we simulate different scenarios of geoeconomic fragmentation. We find that major non-aligned countries benefit from their neutral position, with welfare gains of up to 0.7 percent that vary significantly across sectors. These gains turn into significant losses if they join either the Western or Eastern trade bloc. Moreover, world welfare losses increase from -1.9 percent under incomplete fragmentation to -2.7 percent when non-aligned countries join the West and to -3.7 percent when they join the East. Our results highlight the strategic importance of non-aligned countries in mitigating the negative effects of global trade fragmentation. • We analyze the impact of non-aligned countries on welfare in scenarios of global trade fragmentation. • Using a quantitative trade model, we show that major non-aligned countries benefit from their neutral position. • Global welfare losses rise substantially when non-aligned countries join a trade bloc. • Our results highlight the importance of non-aligned countries in mitigating the negative effects of fragmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112533
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geoeconomic fragmentation and the role of non-aligned countries

Florian Dorn, Lisandra Flach, Andreas Baur, Clemens Fuest
1 citations
Economics Letters
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

Geoeconomic fragmentation and the role of non-aligned countries

Florian Dorn, Lisandra Flach, Andreas Baur, Clemens Fuest
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We analyze how non-aligned countries affect welfare outcomes in scenarios of global trade fragmentation. Using a quantitative trade model covering 141 countries and 65 economic sectors, we simulate different scenarios of geoeconomic fragmentation. We find that major non-aligned countries benefit from their neutral position, with welfare gains of up to 0.7 percent that vary significantly across sectors. These gains turn into significant losses if they join either the Western or Eastern trade bloc. Moreover, world welfare losses increase from -1.9 percent under incomplete fragmentation to -2.7 percent when non-aligned countries join the West and to -3.7 percent when they join the East. Our results highlight the strategic importance of non-aligned countries in mitigating the negative effects of global trade fragmentation. • We analyze the impact of non-aligned countries on welfare in scenarios of global trade fragmentation. • Using a quantitative trade model, we show that major non-aligned countries benefit from their neutral position. • Global welfare losses rise substantially when non-aligned countries join a trade bloc. • Our results highlight the importance of non-aligned countries in mitigating the negative effects of fragmentation.

Economics LettersVol. 255
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geoeconomic fragmentation and the role of non-aligned countries — Florian Dorn, Lisandra Flach, et al. · Economics Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS