Beyond Expert Ratings: Subjective Workload and SDT Metrics for Team Performance in VR Simulations

Effective team communication and cooperation skills are crucial in safety-critical environments, where errors can have devastating consequences including loss of life. This study evaluated the efficacy of using virtual reality (VR) simulations to measure team performance beyond traditional expert ratings and questionnaires. Utilizing a custom-built VR simulator, this work looked at how varying levels of task difficulty and task interdependence requirements impact reported team workload, error rates, and communication patterns among 20 teams of three ( n = 60). Objective metrics investigated included quantity of verbal utterances, error rates, sensitivity ( d ′), and criterion bias ( c ) derived from signal detection theory (SDT), while perceived team workload was assessed using the Team Workload Questionnaire (TWLQ). Findings showed that increased task demand characteristics significantly elevated perceived team workload and error rates while degrading overall task performance and decision-making, leading to a strategy shift. This was evidenced by marked drops in sensitivity and shifts toward a conservative response bias along with an increase in attempted verbal communication. Integrating workload assessments alongside objective error and SDT-based performance measures provides a robust framework for evaluating teams within VR simulations, providing an alternative to traditional team performance evaluation methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251367752
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Expert Ratings: Subjective Workload and SDT Metrics for Team Performance in VR Simulations

Gregory J. Funke, Denny Yu, Vincent G. Duffy, Ryan Thomas Villarreal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Beyond Expert Ratings: Subjective Workload and SDT Metrics for Team Performance in VR Simulations

Gregory J. Funke, Denny Yu, Vincent G. Duffy, Ryan Thomas Villarreal
article en

Abstract

Effective team communication and cooperation skills are crucial in safety-critical environments, where errors can have devastating consequences including loss of life. This study evaluated the efficacy of using virtual reality (VR) simulations to measure team performance beyond traditional expert ratings and questionnaires. Utilizing a custom-built VR simulator, this work looked at how varying levels of task difficulty and task interdependence requirements impact reported team workload, error rates, and communication patterns among 20 teams of three ( n = 60). Objective metrics investigated included quantity of verbal utterances, error rates, sensitivity ( d ′), and criterion bias ( c ) derived from signal detection theory (SDT), while perceived team workload was assessed using the Team Workload Questionnaire (TWLQ). Findings showed that increased task demand characteristics significantly elevated perceived team workload and error rates while degrading overall task performance and decision-making, leading to a strategy shift. This was evidenced by marked drops in sensitivity and shifts toward a conservative response bias along with an increase in attempted verbal communication. Integrating workload assessments alongside objective error and SDT-based performance measures provides a robust framework for evaluating teams within VR simulations, providing an alternative to traditional team performance evaluation methods.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), 59th Medical Wing (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.