Evaluating Intravenous Albumin Usage in Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Intravenous (IV) albumin is commonly used in perioperative care, yet its role in surgical oncology remains unclear. Despite its higher cost and associated risks compared to crystalloids, albumin usage varies significantly in oncology surgery, and no clear clinical guidelines exist. Prior studies in other surgical fields have shown no significant benefit of albumin over crystalloids in patient outcomes, raising questions about its efficacy and necessity in oncology surgery. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether IV albumin administration improves patient outcomes in surgical oncology procedures compared to alternative strategies, such as crystalloids. Methods: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search will be conducted across EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV albumin to alternative fluid strategies in oncology surgery procedures. A panel of experts will rank reported outcomes based on clinical importance, with only those deemed important and critical to decision-making included. All references identified through databases will be screened independently and in duplicate in Covidence. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be performed independently and in duplicate. Meta-analysis will employ a random-effects model, with statistical heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. Preliminary Results: A manual search identified four relevant studies examining albumin use in pancreatectomy, upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, bladder cancer cystectomy, and colorectal cancer tumor resection. All studies found no improvement in postoperative outcomes with albumin administration compared to crystalloids or no albumin. Conclusion: This review will provide critical insights into the clinical effectiveness of IV albumin in surgical oncology, helping to inform evidence-based perioperative care guidelines and optimize healthcare resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/iqurcp19052
Primary Topic
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Intravenous Albumin Usage in Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aviva Moses
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
article

Evaluating Intravenous Albumin Usage in Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aviva Moses
article en

Abstract

Background: Intravenous (IV) albumin is commonly used in perioperative care, yet its role in surgical oncology remains unclear. Despite its higher cost and associated risks compared to crystalloids, albumin usage varies significantly in oncology surgery, and no clear clinical guidelines exist. Prior studies in other surgical fields have shown no significant benefit of albumin over crystalloids in patient outcomes, raising questions about its efficacy and necessity in oncology surgery. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether IV albumin administration improves patient outcomes in surgical oncology procedures compared to alternative strategies, such as crystalloids. Methods: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search will be conducted across EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV albumin to alternative fluid strategies in oncology surgery procedures. A panel of experts will rank reported outcomes based on clinical importance, with only those deemed important and critical to decision-making included. All references identified through databases will be screened independently and in duplicate in Covidence. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be performed independently and in duplicate. Meta-analysis will employ a random-effects model, with statistical heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic. Certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. Preliminary Results: A manual search identified four relevant studies examining albumin use in pancreatectomy, upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, bladder cancer cystectomy, and colorectal cancer tumor resection. All studies found no improvement in postoperative outcomes with albumin administration compared to crystalloids or no albumin. Conclusion: This review will provide critical insights into the clinical effectiveness of IV albumin in surgical oncology, helping to inform evidence-based perioperative care guidelines and optimize healthcare resource allocation.

Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsVol. 19
Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.