How will Kingston Care? Designing for better health outcomes

Seniors have outnumbered children in Kingston, Ontario, since 2008. The Community Foundation for Kingston & Area 2017 Vital Signs report projected that the 65+ age cohort would rise to 27% of Kingston’s population by 2026. (CFKA, 2017) Among the many implications that Kingston’s aging population brings is an increased need for health care services. (Statistics Canada, 2024) The demand comes amidst a nation-wide staffing crisis in the healthcare sector that has already impacted the ability of Kingston to meet the needs of its population. Both public and private long-term care facilities have lengthy waitlists, and the city’s two main hospitals are sometimes forced to accommodate individuals waiting for long-term care in acute-care settings. (Schliesmann, 2016) While a wealth of research has made the connection between exposure to nature and mental wellbeing (Cameron et. al., 2020; Grinde, 2009; Hunt, 2022; Verderber, 1987), Ulrich (1984) identified its potential physical benefits when he found that post-operative patients who had views of nature required less potent pain management and recovered more quickly. As it becomes increasingly necessary for Kingston to invest in expanding its health-care infrastructure, the city is presented with an opportunity to create environments of care that incorporate holistic approaches to health through every stage of life, enhance patient care experiences and promote community wellbeing. By exploring global innovations in health architecture that use evidence based design, this paper seeks to build a frame of reference for a future of better care in the city of Kingston.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/iqurcp19008
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How will Kingston Care? Designing for better health outcomes

Molly McClement
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

How will Kingston Care? Designing for better health outcomes

Molly McClement
article en

Abstract

Seniors have outnumbered children in Kingston, Ontario, since 2008. The Community Foundation for Kingston & Area 2017 Vital Signs report projected that the 65+ age cohort would rise to 27% of Kingston’s population by 2026. (CFKA, 2017) Among the many implications that Kingston’s aging population brings is an increased need for health care services. (Statistics Canada, 2024) The demand comes amidst a nation-wide staffing crisis in the healthcare sector that has already impacted the ability of Kingston to meet the needs of its population. Both public and private long-term care facilities have lengthy waitlists, and the city’s two main hospitals are sometimes forced to accommodate individuals waiting for long-term care in acute-care settings. (Schliesmann, 2016) While a wealth of research has made the connection between exposure to nature and mental wellbeing (Cameron et. al., 2020; Grinde, 2009; Hunt, 2022; Verderber, 1987), Ulrich (1984) identified its potential physical benefits when he found that post-operative patients who had views of nature required less potent pain management and recovered more quickly. As it becomes increasingly necessary for Kingston to invest in expanding its health-care infrastructure, the city is presented with an opportunity to create environments of care that incorporate holistic approaches to health through every stage of life, enhance patient care experiences and promote community wellbeing. By exploring global innovations in health architecture that use evidence based design, this paper seeks to build a frame of reference for a future of better care in the city of Kingston.

Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsVol. 19
Center for Global Development (US), Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.