Comparative Systematic Analysis between High Intellectual Potential and High Functioning Autism: A Research Study

Introduction: Neurodivergence encompasses a range of conditions, including High Intellectual Potential (HIP) and High-Functioning Autism (HFA). These conditions, often viewed as contrasting ends of a spectrum, present diagnostic challenges due to overlapping traits, particularly in clinical, cognitive, and social domains. This systematic analysis explores the extent of their similarities to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles was conducted, focusing on diagnostic criteria, cognitive & psychometric factors, clinical & neurophysiological features, sensory modulation and etiology of HIP and HFA. Data sources included studies utilizing diagnostic tools such as DSM-5 and WISC-IV. Due to a lack of articles directly comparing HIP and HFA cross-referencing and cross-analysis of studies was used. Results: HIP individuals demonstrated superior congnitive and psychometric functioning compared to those with HFA. When examining clinical features, both groups exhibited autistic traits, with HIP showing a lower prevalence than HFA. Clinical and neurophysiological evaluations also highlighted nuanced differences, supported by varying international diagnostic criteria. Etiological findings revealed common developmental influences, including atypical brain hemisphere symmetry and fetal testosterone exposure. Both groups shared sensory modulation challenges. Conclusion: HIP and HFA exhibit significant similarities across several domains, but nuanced differences and the scarcity of direct comparative studies prevent a definitive conclusion regarding their convergence. Misdiagnosis risks highlight the need for precise diagnostic criteria and standardized assessments. Future research must directly compare these populations with diverse demographics to enhance operationalization and construct validity. Standardized global diagnostic frameworks is a necessity to enhance accuracy and reduce diagnostic bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/iqurcp18711
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Systematic Analysis between High Intellectual Potential and High Functioning Autism: A Research Study

Arani Hiritharan
1 links
Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Comparative Systematic Analysis between High Intellectual Potential and High Functioning Autism: A Research Study

Arani Hiritharan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Neurodivergence encompasses a range of conditions, including High Intellectual Potential (HIP) and High-Functioning Autism (HFA). These conditions, often viewed as contrasting ends of a spectrum, present diagnostic challenges due to overlapping traits, particularly in clinical, cognitive, and social domains. This systematic analysis explores the extent of their similarities to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles was conducted, focusing on diagnostic criteria, cognitive & psychometric factors, clinical & neurophysiological features, sensory modulation and etiology of HIP and HFA. Data sources included studies utilizing diagnostic tools such as DSM-5 and WISC-IV. Due to a lack of articles directly comparing HIP and HFA cross-referencing and cross-analysis of studies was used. Results: HIP individuals demonstrated superior congnitive and psychometric functioning compared to those with HFA. When examining clinical features, both groups exhibited autistic traits, with HIP showing a lower prevalence than HFA. Clinical and neurophysiological evaluations also highlighted nuanced differences, supported by varying international diagnostic criteria. Etiological findings revealed common developmental influences, including atypical brain hemisphere symmetry and fetal testosterone exposure. Both groups shared sensory modulation challenges. Conclusion: HIP and HFA exhibit significant similarities across several domains, but nuanced differences and the scarcity of direct comparative studies prevent a definitive conclusion regarding their convergence. Misdiagnosis risks highlight the need for precise diagnostic criteria and standardized assessments. Future research must directly compare these populations with diverse demographics to enhance operationalization and construct validity. Standardized global diagnostic frameworks is a necessity to enhance accuracy and reduce diagnostic bias.

Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsVol. 19
Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Systematic Analysis between High Intellectual Potential and High Functioning Autism: A Research Study — Arani Hiritharan · Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS