Pulsatile Flow Hemodynamics in a Stenosed Artery for Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Rheological Models

Atheromatous disease can cause a heart attack or stroke in humans. This present research aims to investigate the comparison between Newtonian and rheological models in terms of hemodynamic risk factors. A three-dimensional computational model has been considered here for 45%, 60%, and 75% stenoses. The COMSOL Multiphysics software has been used in fluid flow simulation to solve the governing equations. The comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian has been performed to predict the model’s suitability. Hemodynamic parameters such as time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shearing index, and blood residence time show a lower disturbed flow regime for non-Newtonian fluid compared to Newtonian fluid. The TAWSS for 75% stenosis is increased by 54.84% and 37.18% to those of 45% and 60% stenoses. A suitable non-Newtonian model can be used in bioengineering fields.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmsi.2025.134010
Primary Topic
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulsatile Flow Hemodynamics in a Stenosed Artery for Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Rheological Models

Md. Jashim Uddin
Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
article

Pulsatile Flow Hemodynamics in a Stenosed Artery for Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Rheological Models

Md. Jashim Uddin
article en

Abstract

Atheromatous disease can cause a heart attack or stroke in humans. This present research aims to investigate the comparison between Newtonian and rheological models in terms of hemodynamic risk factors. A three-dimensional computational model has been considered here for 45%, 60%, and 75% stenoses. The COMSOL Multiphysics software has been used in fluid flow simulation to solve the governing equations. The comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian has been performed to predict the model’s suitability. Hemodynamic parameters such as time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shearing index, and blood residence time show a lower disturbed flow regime for non-Newtonian fluid compared to Newtonian fluid. The TAWSS for 75% stenosis is increased by 54.84% and 37.18% to those of 45% and 60% stenoses. A suitable non-Newtonian model can be used in bioengineering fields.

Open Journal of Modelling and SimulationVol. 13(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.