Strength-Dependent Differences in the Magnitude and Time Course of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in High Jump Athletes

<b>Background</b>: A post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely improve explosive actions, but its time course may be influenced by individual strength levels. <b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance responses following three PAPE protocols, considering the strength level as a modulating factor in trained high jump athletes. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-one male high jumpers (Tier 3) were divided into stronger (SG, n = 10) and weaker (WG, n = 11) groups based on the median load (80 kg) lifted at 0.8 m/s in a velocity-based half-squat test. The participants completed three squat-based PAPE protocols (velocity loss thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15%) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Their performance in a 10 m sprint (S10) and a countermovement jump (CMJ) was assessed at baseline and 0, 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention. <b>Results</b>: No significant three-way interactions were observed for the S10 or CMJ performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The absolute CMJ performance was consistently higher in the SG across all the time points (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.25, large), with significant peak values observed at 4 min post-activation. However, both groups exhibited transient improvements in their S10 and CMJ performance that were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and of a large magnitude (d = 1.93-3.15), observed at 4 and/or 8 min post-activation, which subsequently declined by 12 min. <b>Conclusions</b>: The strength level modulates both the time course and the magnitude of the PAPE. Stronger athletes responded better to both less and more demanding protocols (5% to 15% velocity loss thresholds) with a 4-8 min recovery, whereas weaker athletes benefited mainly from less demanding stimuli (5% velocity loss thresholds), provided that the recovery was sufficient (≈4 min) to allow potentiation to emerge. However, with more demanding protocols (15% velocity loss thresholds), a longer recovery period (≈8 min) appears necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030333
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength-Dependent Differences in the Magnitude and Time Course of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in High Jump Athletes

Javier Sánchez-Sánchez, Alejandro Rodríguez‐Fernández
3 citations
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
5.16
article

Strength-Dependent Differences in the Magnitude and Time Course of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in High Jump Athletes

Javier Sánchez-Sánchez, Alejandro Rodríguez‐Fernández
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: A post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely improve explosive actions, but its time course may be influenced by individual strength levels. <b>Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance responses following three PAPE protocols, considering the strength level as a modulating factor in trained high jump athletes. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-one male high jumpers (Tier 3) were divided into stronger (SG, n = 10) and weaker (WG, n = 11) groups based on the median load (80 kg) lifted at 0.8 m/s in a velocity-based half-squat test. The participants completed three squat-based PAPE protocols (velocity loss thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15%) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Their performance in a 10 m sprint (S10) and a countermovement jump (CMJ) was assessed at baseline and 0, 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention. <b>Results</b>: No significant three-way interactions were observed for the S10 or CMJ performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The absolute CMJ performance was consistently higher in the SG across all the time points (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.25, large), with significant peak values observed at 4 min post-activation. However, both groups exhibited transient improvements in their S10 and CMJ performance that were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and of a large magnitude (d = 1.93-3.15), observed at 4 and/or 8 min post-activation, which subsequently declined by 12 min. <b>Conclusions</b>: The strength level modulates both the time course and the magnitude of the PAPE. Stronger athletes responded better to both less and more demanding protocols (5% to 15% velocity loss thresholds) with a 4-8 min recovery, whereas weaker athletes benefited mainly from less demanding stimuli (5% velocity loss thresholds), provided that the recovery was sufficient (≈4 min) to allow potentiation to emerge. However, with more demanding protocols (15% velocity loss thresholds), a longer recovery period (≈8 min) appears necessary.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(3)
Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports Performance and Training
5.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.