Shock Melting and Melt Deposit Patterns in Oblique Impacts: Insights From Numerical Simulations

Abstract Hypervelocity impacts induce shock melting and distribute melted materials across planetary surfaces. The impact angle significantly affects melt production and ejecta formation, but systematic studies of these processes in oblique impacts are limited. Here, we employ the shock physics code iSALE‐3D to systematically simulate shock melting, crater excavation, ejection, and melt deposition under lunar gravity conditions with varying impact angles (10°–90°) and impactor diameters (1–30 km), producing transient craters with diameters ranging from ∼10 to 200 km. Simulation results show that the total melt volume decreases by ∼25% when the impact angle drops from 90 (i.e., vertical impact) to 45, and by ∼85% when the angle reduces to 25 (i.e., highly oblique impact). The ratio of ejected to generated melt generally remains constant for impact angles >25, but increases significantly at lower impact angles. With more oblique impacts, melt deposits around craters gradually exhibit an uprange zone of avoidance, similar to the pattern of the entire ejecta blanket. Melt content within the ejecta generally increases with distance from the crater. For impact angles exceeding 45°, crossrange and downrange melt distributions closely resemble those generated by vertical impacts. Notably, our results demonstrate that impact angles <45 produce considerably reduced melt quantity and melt fraction in ejecta relative to vertical impacts, underscoring the critical role of considering impact angle when examining melt production in impact cratering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025je009066
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shock Melting and Melt Deposit Patterns in Oblique Impacts: Insights From Numerical Simulations

Min Ding, Xi‐Zi Luo, Meng‐Hua Zhu, K. Wünnemann et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.15
article

Shock Melting and Melt Deposit Patterns in Oblique Impacts: Insights From Numerical Simulations

Min Ding, Xi‐Zi Luo, Meng‐Hua Zhu, K. Wünnemann, R. Luther, Lukas Manske
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Hypervelocity impacts induce shock melting and distribute melted materials across planetary surfaces. The impact angle significantly affects melt production and ejecta formation, but systematic studies of these processes in oblique impacts are limited. Here, we employ the shock physics code iSALE‐3D to systematically simulate shock melting, crater excavation, ejection, and melt deposition under lunar gravity conditions with varying impact angles (10°–90°) and impactor diameters (1–30 km), producing transient craters with diameters ranging from ∼10 to 200 km. Simulation results show that the total melt volume decreases by ∼25% when the impact angle drops from 90 (i.e., vertical impact) to 45, and by ∼85% when the angle reduces to 25 (i.e., highly oblique impact). The ratio of ejected to generated melt generally remains constant for impact angles >25, but increases significantly at lower impact angles. With more oblique impacts, melt deposits around craters gradually exhibit an uprange zone of avoidance, similar to the pattern of the entire ejecta blanket. Melt content within the ejecta generally increases with distance from the crater. For impact angles exceeding 45°, crossrange and downrange melt distributions closely resemble those generated by vertical impacts. Notably, our results demonstrate that impact angles <45 produce considerably reduced melt quantity and melt fraction in ejecta relative to vertical impacts, underscoring the critical role of considering impact angle when examining melt production in impact cratering.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(9)
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), Museum für Naturkunde (DE), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Institute of Geological Sciences (AM)
Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.