Game Theoretical AI for Precision Medicine

Current clinical decision-making relies heavily on doctors’ experience, often leading to generic treatments that overlook individual patient factors. A lack of clinical expertise, especially in resource-limited regions, hinders optimal decisions and contributes to higher patient mortality. To address this, traditional AI systems have modeled clinical decision-making as a predator-prey game. However, such approaches fail to recognize that disease agents, such as cancer cells, can exhibit adaptive, human-like intelligence. Immunological studies reveal that malignant tumors evade the immune system through camouflage, coercion, and cytoprotection. To counter these adaptive strategies, game-theoretic approaches are essential. In this paper, we present Game Theoretical AI (GTAI)—a novel approach that formalizes and automates strategic reasoning to enhance clinical decision-making against complex diseases. Inspired by Sun Tzu's The Art of War and the Thirty-Six Stratagems, GTAI mimics expert clinical reasoning through four stages: (1) observation and diagnosis, (2) treatment planning, (3) execution, and (4) outcome evaluation. Within this framework, GTAI can dynamically select and carry out high-level tactics analogous to humans' stratagems at each decision stage. This unified approach yields six major discoveries that bridge theory and practice. Collectively, these advances demonstrate the power of integrating strategic intelligence with computational models, opening new avenues for the application of AI in precision medicine and adaptive clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/tai.2025.100011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Game Theoretical AI for Precision Medicine

Dapeng Wu, Siyuan Guo
1 citations
Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
2.11
article

Game Theoretical AI for Precision Medicine

Dapeng Wu, Siyuan Guo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Current clinical decision-making relies heavily on doctors’ experience, often leading to generic treatments that overlook individual patient factors. A lack of clinical expertise, especially in resource-limited regions, hinders optimal decisions and contributes to higher patient mortality. To address this, traditional AI systems have modeled clinical decision-making as a predator-prey game. However, such approaches fail to recognize that disease agents, such as cancer cells, can exhibit adaptive, human-like intelligence. Immunological studies reveal that malignant tumors evade the immune system through camouflage, coercion, and cytoprotection. To counter these adaptive strategies, game-theoretic approaches are essential. In this paper, we present Game Theoretical AI (GTAI)—a novel approach that formalizes and automates strategic reasoning to enhance clinical decision-making against complex diseases. Inspired by Sun Tzu's The Art of War and the Thirty-Six Stratagems, GTAI mimics expert clinical reasoning through four stages: (1) observation and diagnosis, (2) treatment planning, (3) execution, and (4) outcome evaluation. Within this framework, GTAI can dynamically select and carry out high-level tactics analogous to humans' stratagems at each decision stage. This unified approach yields six major discoveries that bridge theory and practice. Collectively, these advances demonstrate the power of integrating strategic intelligence with computational models, opening new avenues for the application of AI in precision medicine and adaptive clinical practice.

Transactions on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 1(1)
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Innovation and Technology Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.