Empirical Analysis of Potential Causes of the KOREA DISCOUNT

Using extensive firm-level data, this study evaluates the explanatory power of shareholder rights and payout ratios, factors commonly cited as contributing to the “Korea Discount.” Our analysis of a sample of 58 countries from 2002 to 2018 reveals that shareholder rights or protection in Korea's market are not inferior to those in other markets. Conversely, Korea’s market ranks lower on the Economic Policy and World Uncertainty Indices, suggesting that these factors are potential causes of the Korea Discount. Meanwhile, compared with companies in other countries, Korean companies make larger payouts (i.e., the sum of dividends and share repurchases). Notably, firm value plummeted over the long term in markets where payouts increased the most. Therefore, there is no empirical evidence that "low payouts cause the Korea Discount" or "higher payouts can resolve the Korea Discount." Finally, South Korea’s market shows a significant turnover, indicating short-term investment behavior, and very low value-relevance, suggesting that short-term investors dominate the Korean market and do not consider corporate fundamentals. The study also found that low value-relevance and high turnover are associated with low firm value in our sample countries, indicating a relation between excessive short-term trading and the Korea Discount.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26845/kjfs.2025.08.54.4.327
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Analysis of Potential Causes of the KOREA DISCOUNT

Jungwon Suh, Sora Choi, Hyunseok Kim
Korean Journal of Financial Studies
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Empirical Analysis of Potential Causes of the KOREA DISCOUNT

Jungwon Suh, Sora Choi, Hyunseok Kim
article en

Abstract

Using extensive firm-level data, this study evaluates the explanatory power of shareholder rights and payout ratios, factors commonly cited as contributing to the “Korea Discount.” Our analysis of a sample of 58 countries from 2002 to 2018 reveals that shareholder rights or protection in Korea's market are not inferior to those in other markets. Conversely, Korea’s market ranks lower on the Economic Policy and World Uncertainty Indices, suggesting that these factors are potential causes of the Korea Discount. Meanwhile, compared with companies in other countries, Korean companies make larger payouts (i.e., the sum of dividends and share repurchases). Notably, firm value plummeted over the long term in markets where payouts increased the most. Therefore, there is no empirical evidence that "low payouts cause the Korea Discount" or "higher payouts can resolve the Korea Discount." Finally, South Korea’s market shows a significant turnover, indicating short-term investment behavior, and very low value-relevance, suggesting that short-term investors dominate the Korean market and do not consider corporate fundamentals. The study also found that low value-relevance and high turnover are associated with low firm value in our sample countries, indicating a relation between excessive short-term trading and the Korea Discount.

Korean Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 54(4)
Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea, Economic Research Institute, Samsung
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.