Turning regret into future disaster preparedness with no regrets

Abstract. Global efforts are focusing on long-term preparedness for disasters, highlighting the need to make well-informed decisions in advance to avoid panic behaviour when a disaster strikes. Making well-informed decisions includes the evaluation of the potential outcomes of a decision or action to avoid regretting them afterwards. However, little is known about what we regret about our actions and inactions in the context of disasters. Using the responses of a survey disseminated in flood-affected areas in Germany in 2021, this study dives into the post-disaster regrets of citizens (438 respondents). The results showed that participants only regretted preparedness actions when the actions threatened their life, but mostly, participants regretted their inaction. Overall, the results indicate the need to promote long-term preparedness, which can be supported by the “no-regrets” approach. Furthermore, the need to integrate actions supporting psychological preparedness was identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2929-2025
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turning regret into future disaster preparedness with no regrets

Jessica Neumann, Hannah Cloke, Milan Kalaš, Sophie Blackburn et al.
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Turning regret into future disaster preparedness with no regrets

Jessica Neumann, Hannah Cloke, Milan Kalaš, Sophie Blackburn, Joy Ommer
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Global efforts are focusing on long-term preparedness for disasters, highlighting the need to make well-informed decisions in advance to avoid panic behaviour when a disaster strikes. Making well-informed decisions includes the evaluation of the potential outcomes of a decision or action to avoid regretting them afterwards. However, little is known about what we regret about our actions and inactions in the context of disasters. Using the responses of a survey disseminated in flood-affected areas in Germany in 2021, this study dives into the post-disaster regrets of citizens (438 respondents). The results showed that participants only regretted preparedness actions when the actions threatened their life, but mostly, participants regretted their inaction. Overall, the results indicate the need to promote long-term preparedness, which can be supported by the “no-regrets” approach. Furthermore, the need to integrate actions supporting psychological preparedness was identified.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 25(8)
University of Reading (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Natural Environment Research Council, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Turning regret into future disaster preparedness with no regrets — Jessica Neumann, Hannah Cloke, et al. · Natural hazards and earth system sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS