A State-of-the-Art Review of the Hydrodynamics of Offshore Pipelines Under Submarine Gravity Flows and Their Interactions

Submarine gravity flows, e.g., debris flows and turbidity currents, pose a significant threat to offshore pipeline integrity. This risk primarily manifests through the imposition of substantial dynamic loads on pipelines or their large displacement when impacted by such flows. To enhance our understanding of these threats and facilitate the development of more robust pipeline design and protection strategies, this work reviewed the interactions between submarine gravity flows and offshore pipelines. For an individual pipeline, critical focus lies in characterizing the influence of key parameters—including Reynolds number, span height, impact angle, pipe geometry, ambient temperature, and surface roughness—on both the resultant impact forces and the fluid-structure interaction dynamics. Then, investigations into the interactions between gravity flows and multiple pipes are summarized, where the in-line spacing distance between two pipes is a key factor in reducing the impact force. Further, flow-induced vibration responses of a single pipeline and two tandem pipelines under gravity flows are presented. Building upon a thorough review, we conducted overall evaluations. There are few experimental studies and most investigations ideally treat the seabed to be horizontal, which does not always occur in practical engineering. Choosing empirical formulas to evaluate hydrodynamic loads should carefully consider the specific working conditions. An appropriate non-Newtonian fluid model is significantly important to avoid uncertainties. Some practical risk reduction measures such as streamlined structures and reduction in roughness are recommended. Finally, suggestions for future study and practice are proposed, including the requirement for three-dimensional numerical investigations, assessment of fatigue damage by flow-induced vibrations, consideration of flexible pipeline, and more attention to multiple pipelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091654
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A State-of-the-Art Review of the Hydrodynamics of Offshore Pipelines Under Submarine Gravity Flows and Their Interactions

H Zhang, Tao‐Tao Tang, Guochao Wu, Fan Zhang et al.
3 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
3.44
article

A State-of-the-Art Review of the Hydrodynamics of Offshore Pipelines Under Submarine Gravity Flows and Their Interactions

H Zhang, Tao‐Tao Tang, Guochao Wu, Fan Zhang, Chengjiao Ren, Cheng Zhang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Submarine gravity flows, e.g., debris flows and turbidity currents, pose a significant threat to offshore pipeline integrity. This risk primarily manifests through the imposition of substantial dynamic loads on pipelines or their large displacement when impacted by such flows. To enhance our understanding of these threats and facilitate the development of more robust pipeline design and protection strategies, this work reviewed the interactions between submarine gravity flows and offshore pipelines. For an individual pipeline, critical focus lies in characterizing the influence of key parameters—including Reynolds number, span height, impact angle, pipe geometry, ambient temperature, and surface roughness—on both the resultant impact forces and the fluid-structure interaction dynamics. Then, investigations into the interactions between gravity flows and multiple pipes are summarized, where the in-line spacing distance between two pipes is a key factor in reducing the impact force. Further, flow-induced vibration responses of a single pipeline and two tandem pipelines under gravity flows are presented. Building upon a thorough review, we conducted overall evaluations. There are few experimental studies and most investigations ideally treat the seabed to be horizontal, which does not always occur in practical engineering. Choosing empirical formulas to evaluate hydrodynamic loads should carefully consider the specific working conditions. An appropriate non-Newtonian fluid model is significantly important to avoid uncertainties. Some practical risk reduction measures such as streamlined structures and reduction in roughness are recommended. Finally, suggestions for future study and practice are proposed, including the requirement for three-dimensional numerical investigations, assessment of fatigue damage by flow-induced vibrations, consideration of flexible pipeline, and more attention to multiple pipelines.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 13(9)
The University of Western Australia (AU), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Second Institute of Oceanography (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, South China University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.