Eco-Friendly Extraction of Olive Leaf Phenolics and Terpenes: A Comparative Performance Analysis Against Conventional Methods

The present study focuses on recovering phenolic compounds and terpenes from olive leaves, which are generated as by-products during olive oil processing. To this end, conventional extraction/maceration (CE) and advanced extraction techniques such as subcritical water extraction (SWE), pressurized fluid extraction (PLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) were employed to compare and determine the most effective procedure. The phenolic and terpenoid composition of the extracts revealed a total of 33 compounds in HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis. According to these findings, the optimal extraction techniques for the maximum recovery of secoiridoids from olive leaves were PLE and UAE, with no significant difference between them (21.9891 ± 2.5521 mg/g DW and 21.0888 ± 1.3494 mg/g DW, respectively). Regarding to flavonoids, UAE was the most effective extraction technique, yielding 4.9837 ± 0.6739 mg/g DW. However, SWE recovered the highest amount of phenolic alcohols (7.4201 ± 0.9848 mg/g DW), which could be due to degradation of the secoiridoids during extraction. Conversely, UAE was more successful than the other techniques for the extraction of the terpene family (0.7373 ± 0.0601 mg/g DW). The present study therefore focuses on comparing different extraction techniques for revalorizing olive leaves as a source of bioactive compounds, specifically polyphenols and terpenes, due to their beneficial health properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173030
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eco-Friendly Extraction of Olive Leaf Phenolics and Terpenes: A Comparative Performance Analysis Against Conventional Methods

Jesús Lozano‐Sánchez, Isabel Borrás‐Linares, Rosa Quirantes‐Piné, Lucía López-Salas et al.
5 citations
Foods
Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
5.81
article

Eco-Friendly Extraction of Olive Leaf Phenolics and Terpenes: A Comparative Performance Analysis Against Conventional Methods

Jesús Lozano‐Sánchez, Isabel Borrás‐Linares, Rosa Quirantes‐Piné, Lucía López-Salas, Xavier Expósito-Almellón, Alejandro Fernández‐Arteaga, Anderson Valencia-Isaza
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The present study focuses on recovering phenolic compounds and terpenes from olive leaves, which are generated as by-products during olive oil processing. To this end, conventional extraction/maceration (CE) and advanced extraction techniques such as subcritical water extraction (SWE), pressurized fluid extraction (PLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) were employed to compare and determine the most effective procedure. The phenolic and terpenoid composition of the extracts revealed a total of 33 compounds in HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis. According to these findings, the optimal extraction techniques for the maximum recovery of secoiridoids from olive leaves were PLE and UAE, with no significant difference between them (21.9891 ± 2.5521 mg/g DW and 21.0888 ± 1.3494 mg/g DW, respectively). Regarding to flavonoids, UAE was the most effective extraction technique, yielding 4.9837 ± 0.6739 mg/g DW. However, SWE recovered the highest amount of phenolic alcohols (7.4201 ± 0.9848 mg/g DW), which could be due to degradation of the secoiridoids during extraction. Conversely, UAE was more successful than the other techniques for the extraction of the terpene family (0.7373 ± 0.0601 mg/g DW). The present study therefore focuses on comparing different extraction techniques for revalorizing olive leaves as a source of bioactive compounds, specifically polyphenols and terpenes, due to their beneficial health properties.

FoodsVol. 14(17)
Universidad de Granada (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universidad de Granada, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
5.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.