In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of three nanohybrid resin composites before and after dry and wet polishing

Both dry and wet polishing were effective in reducing the surface roughness of Opallis and Tetric N-Ceram resin composites, whereas in Filtek Z250XT, a significant reduction was observed only with wet polishing. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of the polishing procedure may vary depending on the type of resin composite, which should be considered when selecting clinical finishing and polishing protocols to optimize the surface properties of restorative materials. <b>Key words:</b>Comparative study, Composite Resins, Dental materials, Dental polishing, Surface properties, surface roughness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.63063
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of three nanohybrid resin composites before and after dry and wet polishing

Marysela Ladera‐Castañeda, José Huamaní-Echaccaya, José Rosas, Leonor Castro-Ramirez et al.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of three nanohybrid resin composites before and after dry and wet polishing

Marysela Ladera‐Castañeda, José Huamaní-Echaccaya, José Rosas, Leonor Castro-Ramirez, César Cayo-Rojas, Aldana Quispe-Pillco, Xiomara Bendezú-Quispe
article en

Abstract

Both dry and wet polishing were effective in reducing the surface roughness of Opallis and Tetric N-Ceram resin composites, whereas in Filtek Z250XT, a significant reduction was observed only with wet polishing. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of the polishing procedure may vary depending on the type of resin composite, which should be considered when selecting clinical finishing and polishing protocols to optimize the surface properties of restorative materials. <b>Key words:</b>Comparative study, Composite Resins, Dental materials, Dental polishing, Surface properties, surface roughness.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental DentistryVol. 17(9)
Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of three nanohybrid resin composites before and after dry and wet polishing — Marysela Ladera‐Castañeda, José Huamaní-Echaccaya, et al. · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS