Proportionality in multiple dimensions to design electoral systems

Abstract Proportionality is a foundational principle in the election of representatives for legislative bodies. In this work, we provide an axiomatic justification for a recently proposed notion of multidimensional proportionality and extend it to incorporate two common electoral constraints: vote threshold for list eligibility and the election of the most-voted candidate in each district. Building on these results, we design methods based on multidimensional proportionality and apply them to the 2021 Chilean Constitutional Convention election, considering political lists, districts, and genders as dimensions. We evaluate the resulting apportionments according to three criteria: proportionality, representativeness, and voting power. Whereas local and global methods exhibit a natural trade-off between local and global proportionality, incorporating the election of district-level winners into methods based on 3-dimensional proportionality enables a balance between both notions while ensuring higher representativeness and a more equitable voting power. These findings are further supported by experiments on the 2023 Finnish Parliamentary Election.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01623-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportionality in multiple dimensions to design electoral systems

Javier Cembrano, José Correa, Víctor Verdugo, Gonzalo Pardo Díaz
1 citations
Social Choice and Welfare
Game Theory and Voting Systems
3.13
article

Proportionality in multiple dimensions to design electoral systems

Javier Cembrano, José Correa, Víctor Verdugo, Gonzalo Pardo Díaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Proportionality is a foundational principle in the election of representatives for legislative bodies. In this work, we provide an axiomatic justification for a recently proposed notion of multidimensional proportionality and extend it to incorporate two common electoral constraints: vote threshold for list eligibility and the election of the most-voted candidate in each district. Building on these results, we design methods based on multidimensional proportionality and apply them to the 2021 Chilean Constitutional Convention election, considering political lists, districts, and genders as dimensions. We evaluate the resulting apportionments according to three criteria: proportionality, representativeness, and voting power. Whereas local and global methods exhibit a natural trade-off between local and global proportionality, incorporating the election of district-level winners into methods based on 3-dimensional proportionality enables a balance between both notions while ensuring higher representativeness and a more equitable voting power. These findings are further supported by experiments on the 2023 Finnish Parliamentary Election.

Social Choice and Welfare
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Cornell University (US), Max Planck Institute for Informatics (DE), SC Johnson (United States) (US), University of Chile (CL)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.