Comparison of the Predictive Roles of CT- and MRI-Based Pedicle Regional Osteoporosis Status Measurements for Pedicle Screw Loosening After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study DesignRetrospective Study.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of pedicle Hounsfield unit (HU) values and pedicle bone quality (PBQ) scores in predicting pedicle screw loosening (PSL) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in elderly patients and to identify the most discriminative bone mineral density (BMD) assessment indicator.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 275 consecutive patients who underwent PLIF. L<sub>1</sub> and pedicle HU values were obtained from CT scans, whereas vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and PBQ scores were obtained from MRI. Logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with PSL. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of pedicle HU and PBQ score for PSL and to additionally compare their predictive value with that of L<sub>1</sub> HU value and VBQ score.ResultsThe PSL rate was 20.36% (56/275). The loosening group demonstrated a higher postoperative low-back pain visual analog scale score (<i>P</i> < 0.05), lower L<sub>1</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher VBQ (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and PBQ scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001) than the non-loosening group. The logistic regression analysis identified L<sub>1</sub> (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and VBQ (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.43-5.52, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and PBQ scores (OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.03-7.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001) as independent predictors of PSL. The area under the curve for L<sub>1</sub> and pedicle HU values and VBQ and PBQ scores were 0.751, 0.766, 0.684, and 0.702, respectively. The optimal pedicle HU cut-off for predicting PSL was 106.32 (sensitivity: 78.49%; specificity: 75.00%).ConclusionsPedicle HU values exhibited a relatively higher predictive performance for PSL compared with the PBQ score and served as the most discriminative BMD indicator in patients who underwent PLIF. Measuring the pedicle HU value preoperatively help surgeons to select a more appropriate surgical plan and is expected to improve the patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251371602
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Predictive Roles of CT- and MRI-Based Pedicle Regional Osteoporosis Status Measurements for Pedicle Screw Loosening After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Ning Fan, Lei Zang, Aobo Wang, Shuo Yuan et al.
1 citations
Global Spine Journal
Medical Imaging and Analysis
0.67
article

Comparison of the Predictive Roles of CT- and MRI-Based Pedicle Regional Osteoporosis Status Measurements for Pedicle Screw Loosening After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Ning Fan, Lei Zang, Aobo Wang, Shuo Yuan, Peng Du, Tianyi Wang, Ziqian Ma, Ruiyuan Chen, Minghui Liang, Yu Xi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective Study.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of pedicle Hounsfield unit (HU) values and pedicle bone quality (PBQ) scores in predicting pedicle screw loosening (PSL) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in elderly patients and to identify the most discriminative bone mineral density (BMD) assessment indicator.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 275 consecutive patients who underwent PLIF. L<sub>1</sub> and pedicle HU values were obtained from CT scans, whereas vertebral bone quality (VBQ) and PBQ scores were obtained from MRI. Logistic regression analysis determined factors associated with PSL. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive value of pedicle HU and PBQ score for PSL and to additionally compare their predictive value with that of L<sub>1</sub> HU value and VBQ score.ResultsThe PSL rate was 20.36% (56/275). The loosening group demonstrated a higher postoperative low-back pain visual analog scale score (<i>P</i> < 0.05), lower L<sub>1</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher VBQ (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and PBQ scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001) than the non-loosening group. The logistic regression analysis identified L<sub>1</sub> (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and pedicle HU values (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98-0.99, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and VBQ (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.43-5.52, <i>P</i> = 0.003) and PBQ scores (OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.03-7.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001) as independent predictors of PSL. The area under the curve for L<sub>1</sub> and pedicle HU values and VBQ and PBQ scores were 0.751, 0.766, 0.684, and 0.702, respectively. The optimal pedicle HU cut-off for predicting PSL was 106.32 (sensitivity: 78.49%; specificity: 75.00%).ConclusionsPedicle HU values exhibited a relatively higher predictive performance for PSL compared with the PBQ score and served as the most discriminative BMD indicator in patients who underwent PLIF. Measuring the pedicle HU value preoperatively help surgeons to select a more appropriate surgical plan and is expected to improve the patient outcomes.

Global Spine JournalVol. 16(2)
Capital Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.