The impact of immersive virtual reality training in thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Up to this date, there have been no reports on immersive virtual reality (IVR) training in thyroid surgery. The purpose of this blinded, randomized controlled trial was to determine the validity and impact of VR training in residents' education. Nineteen general surgery residents participated in the trial comparing IVR with traditional learning, utilizing a technical textbook as a control. A stratified randomization was used to secure balance in the distribution of residents according to their experience. The examined task pertained to the surgical steps from neck incision up to the placement of the continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode and was evaluated by a blinded Fellow of the European Board of Surgery (FEBS) certified endocrine surgeon. Training superiority was assessed by the outcome measures of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score, need for the main surgeon to intervene, verbal answers, and time to task completion. Participants completed questionnaires regarding face validity and perceived benefits of the educational process. Immersive VR group completed the task significantly faster (p = 0.012), at a mean time of 27.25 ± 3.8 vs 35.25 ± 6.5 min in the control group, and was superior in OSATS Overall score (p = 0.035), knowledge of instruments (p = 0.015) and flow of operation (p = 0.021) scores. In the dedicated questionnaire, the participants of the IVR group stated greater overall satisfaction of the educational process (p = 0.002), ease of use (p = 0.015), enjoyment (p < 0.001), repetitivity (0.001), and perceived improvement in surgical technique (0.021). The IVR group dedicated more time in training 39 ± 8.9 vs 27.5 ± 7.2 min (p = 0.014), and performed more repetitions of the educative module, 3.5 (2-5) vs 2 (1-3) (p = 0.003) than the control group. IVR training demonstrated improved outcomes in several translational technical skills acquisition over traditional learning, while yielding improved satisfaction and repetitivity for participants. Clinical trials registration number No: NCT06917755.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Updates in Surgery
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02387-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of immersive virtual reality training in thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Nikolaos Voloudakis, E Bellou, Anestis Basios, Ioannis Koutelidakis et al.
1 citations
Updates in Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
article

The impact of immersive virtual reality training in thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Nikolaos Voloudakis, E Bellou, Anestis Basios, Ioannis Koutelidakis, Kyriakos Vamvakidis, Maria Velikoudi, Basileios Papaziogas, Stefanos Atmatzidis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Up to this date, there have been no reports on immersive virtual reality (IVR) training in thyroid surgery. The purpose of this blinded, randomized controlled trial was to determine the validity and impact of VR training in residents' education. Nineteen general surgery residents participated in the trial comparing IVR with traditional learning, utilizing a technical textbook as a control. A stratified randomization was used to secure balance in the distribution of residents according to their experience. The examined task pertained to the surgical steps from neck incision up to the placement of the continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode and was evaluated by a blinded Fellow of the European Board of Surgery (FEBS) certified endocrine surgeon. Training superiority was assessed by the outcome measures of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score, need for the main surgeon to intervene, verbal answers, and time to task completion. Participants completed questionnaires regarding face validity and perceived benefits of the educational process. Immersive VR group completed the task significantly faster (p = 0.012), at a mean time of 27.25 ± 3.8 vs 35.25 ± 6.5 min in the control group, and was superior in OSATS Overall score (p = 0.035), knowledge of instruments (p = 0.015) and flow of operation (p = 0.021) scores. In the dedicated questionnaire, the participants of the IVR group stated greater overall satisfaction of the educational process (p = 0.002), ease of use (p = 0.015), enjoyment (p < 0.001), repetitivity (0.001), and perceived improvement in surgical technique (0.021). The IVR group dedicated more time in training 39 ± 8.9 vs 27.5 ± 7.2 min (p = 0.014), and performed more repetitions of the educative module, 3.5 (2-5) vs 2 (1-3) (p = 0.003) than the control group. IVR training demonstrated improved outcomes in several translational technical skills acquisition over traditional learning, while yielding improved satisfaction and repetitivity for participants. Clinical trials registration number No: NCT06917755.

Updates in SurgeryVol. 77(8)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), 424 General Military Hospital (GR), Henry Dunant Hospital (GR)
European Commission, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.