Advancing Requirements Engineering with Large Language Models

This paper examines the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the requirements engineering process to improve the quality of textual product requirements. A custom-developed software tool demonstrates the utilization of LLMs in practically relevant workflows to reformulate requirements and assess their adherence to predefined quality criteria. In a comparative study, GPT-4o outperformed other models, closely aligning with human performance in quality assessments. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to significantly enhance the process of working with textual product requirements, which often vary in quality and structure, with significant implications for the broader field of software and product development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.120
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Requirements Engineering with Large Language Models

Claudius Ellsel, Rainer Stark
1 citations
Procedia CIRP
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
3.25
article

Advancing Requirements Engineering with Large Language Models

Claudius Ellsel, Rainer Stark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the requirements engineering process to improve the quality of textual product requirements. A custom-developed software tool demonstrates the utilization of LLMs in practically relevant workflows to reformulate requirements and assess their adherence to predefined quality criteria. In a comparative study, GPT-4o outperformed other models, closely aligning with human performance in quality assessments. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to significantly enhance the process of working with textual product requirements, which often vary in quality and structure, with significant implications for the broader field of software and product development.

Procedia CIRPVol. 136
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.