Evaluation of a Descriptive Approach for Product Portfolio Modeling – A No-Success Story and What we can Learn From it

Increasing product variety and shorter life cycles require new descriptive approaches to advance multiple products in product portfolios. This article focuses on the support, application, and success evaluation of an initial descriptive model for the advancement of product portfolios. For this purpose, requirements for the evaluation are determined. A workshop concept was developed and evaluated with 161 participants divided into test and control groups. While the evaluation shows no significant improvement between the groups, the analysis shows differences in performance and indications concerning the workshop concept, revealing learnings and limitations for conducting future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.176
Primary Topic
Product Development and Customization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Descriptive Approach for Product Portfolio Modeling – A No-Success Story and What we can Learn From it

Albert Albers, Michael Schlegel, Felix Pfaff, Christoph Kempf
Procedia CIRP
Product Development and Customization
article

Evaluation of a Descriptive Approach for Product Portfolio Modeling – A No-Success Story and What we can Learn From it

Albert Albers, Michael Schlegel, Felix Pfaff, Christoph Kempf
article en

Abstract

Increasing product variety and shorter life cycles require new descriptive approaches to advance multiple products in product portfolios. This article focuses on the support, application, and success evaluation of an initial descriptive model for the advancement of product portfolios. For this purpose, requirements for the evaluation are determined. A workshop concept was developed and evaluated with 161 participants divided into test and control groups. While the evaluation shows no significant improvement between the groups, the analysis shows differences in performance and indications concerning the workshop concept, revealing learnings and limitations for conducting future studies.

Procedia CIRPVol. 136
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Product Development and Customization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of a Descriptive Approach for Product Portfolio Modeling – A No-Success Story and What we can Learn From it — Albert Albers, Michael Schlegel, et al. · Procedia CIRP (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS