Per‐Event Uncertainty Quantification for Flow Cytometry Using Calibration Beads

Flow cytometry measurements are widely used in diagnostics and medical decision making. Incomplete understanding of sources of measurement uncertainty can make it difficult to distinguish autofluorescence and background sources from signals of interest. Moreover, established methods for modeling uncertainty overlook the fact that the apparent distribution of measurements is a convolution of the inherent population variability (e.g., associated with calibration beads or cells) and instrument-induced effects. Such issues make it difficult, for example, to identify signals from small objects such as extracellular vesicles. To overcome such limitations, we formulate an explicit probabilistic measurement model that accounts for volume and labeling variation, background signals, and fluorescence shot noise. Using raw data from routine per-event calibration measurements, we use this model to separate the aforementioned sources of uncertainty and demonstrate how such information can be used to facilitate decision making and instrument characterization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cytometry Part A
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24954
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Per‐Event Uncertainty Quantification for Flow Cytometry Using Calibration Beads

Anthony J. Kearsley, Gregory A. Cooksey, Megan A. Catterton, Paul N. Patrone et al.
Cytometry Part A
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
article

Per‐Event Uncertainty Quantification for Flow Cytometry Using Calibration Beads

Anthony J. Kearsley, Gregory A. Cooksey, Megan A. Catterton, Paul N. Patrone, Prajakta Bedekar, Matthew DiSalvo
article en

Abstract

Flow cytometry measurements are widely used in diagnostics and medical decision making. Incomplete understanding of sources of measurement uncertainty can make it difficult to distinguish autofluorescence and background sources from signals of interest. Moreover, established methods for modeling uncertainty overlook the fact that the apparent distribution of measurements is a convolution of the inherent population variability (e.g., associated with calibration beads or cells) and instrument-induced effects. Such issues make it difficult, for example, to identify signals from small objects such as extracellular vesicles. To overcome such limitations, we formulate an explicit probabilistic measurement model that accounts for volume and labeling variation, background signals, and fluorescence shot noise. Using raw data from routine per-event calibration measurements, we use this model to separate the aforementioned sources of uncertainty and demonstrate how such information can be used to facilitate decision making and instrument characterization.

Cytometry Part AVol. 107(9)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Physical Measurement Laboratory (US), Information Technology Laboratory (US)
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Per‐Event Uncertainty Quantification for Flow Cytometry Using Calibration Beads — Anthony J. Kearsley, Gregory A. Cooksey, et al. · Cytometry Part A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS