Exploring the Trade‐Offs and Synergies Among Agricultural Land Use Benefits and Their Principal Influencing Factors: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Development

ABSTRACT Agricultural land plays a pivotal role in safeguarding food security and improving farmers' living standards. However, its utilization faces sustainability challenges due to greenhouse gas emissions and associated environmental impacts. Improving agricultural land use benefits (ALUB) has become imperative for achieving sustainable agricultural development. This study combines the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with agricultural land systems to construct a novel “element‐structure–function‐benefit‐interaction” theoretical model for understanding ALUB. Methodologically, using county‐level data (2000–2020) from Hubei Province, we first quantified the ALUB indices for 75 counties through the evaluation index system. Then, we analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of trade‐off and synergy relationships among ALUB dimensions via a Mechanical Equilibrium Model. Finally, we identified key influencing factors using the Optimal Parameters Geographical Detector. Results show: (1) Economic, social, and comprehensive benefits showed fluctuating growth, whereas ecological benefits remained relatively stable; (2) The 2020 average coordination level (0.378) indicated basic coordination, with stable non‐high‐coordination spatial patterns; (3) Socioeconomic factors (e.g., GDP density, rural labor force) predominantly influenced trade‐off/synergy relationships. Through deviation distribution analysis, the counties were categorized into three distinct typologies: excellent ecological benefits but weak economic and poor social benefits (Quadrant I), excellent economic benefits but weak ecological and poor social benefits (Quadrant II), and excellent ecological benefits but weak social and poor economic benefits (Quadrant VI). Based on these classifications, tailored optimization strategies were proposed to enhance coordination among ALUB dimensions. This study not only enriches the conceptual framework of ALUB formation and its interrelationships but also provides practical guidance for sustainable agricultural land management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70145
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Trade‐Offs and Synergies Among Agricultural Land Use Benefits and Their Principal Influencing Factors: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Development

Xiaoling Huang, Ying Wang, Zhaojun Wang, Haiyang Li
Land Degradation and Development
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Exploring the Trade‐Offs and Synergies Among Agricultural Land Use Benefits and Their Principal Influencing Factors: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Development

Xiaoling Huang, Ying Wang, Zhaojun Wang, Haiyang Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agricultural land plays a pivotal role in safeguarding food security and improving farmers' living standards. However, its utilization faces sustainability challenges due to greenhouse gas emissions and associated environmental impacts. Improving agricultural land use benefits (ALUB) has become imperative for achieving sustainable agricultural development. This study combines the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with agricultural land systems to construct a novel “element‐structure–function‐benefit‐interaction” theoretical model for understanding ALUB. Methodologically, using county‐level data (2000–2020) from Hubei Province, we first quantified the ALUB indices for 75 counties through the evaluation index system. Then, we analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of trade‐off and synergy relationships among ALUB dimensions via a Mechanical Equilibrium Model. Finally, we identified key influencing factors using the Optimal Parameters Geographical Detector. Results show: (1) Economic, social, and comprehensive benefits showed fluctuating growth, whereas ecological benefits remained relatively stable; (2) The 2020 average coordination level (0.378) indicated basic coordination, with stable non‐high‐coordination spatial patterns; (3) Socioeconomic factors (e.g., GDP density, rural labor force) predominantly influenced trade‐off/synergy relationships. Through deviation distribution analysis, the counties were categorized into three distinct typologies: excellent ecological benefits but weak economic and poor social benefits (Quadrant I), excellent economic benefits but weak ecological and poor social benefits (Quadrant II), and excellent ecological benefits but weak social and poor economic benefits (Quadrant VI). Based on these classifications, tailored optimization strategies were proposed to enhance coordination among ALUB dimensions. This study not only enriches the conceptual framework of ALUB formation and its interrelationships but also provides practical guidance for sustainable agricultural land management.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 37(3)
Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.