Clinical and Virological Profiles Associated with CINTEC® PLUS Positivity: A Data-Driven Clustering and Modeling Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The diagnostic performance of CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS can be influenced by numerous patient characteristics and risk factors. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and model the risk factors associated with CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS test positivity in patients undergoing cervical cancer screening and to assess their predictive performance for the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 using an unsupervised machine learning-based model. <b>Methods</b>: Medical data of 134 patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection who underwent CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS testing were used to model the impact of risk factors on dual-stain cytology positivity and to evaluate the predictive performance for CIN2/3. <b>Results</b>: The gradient boosting classifier for the prediction of CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS positivity using clinical risk factors had a precision of 75%, an overall accuracy of 0.62, and an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.77. Body mass index and age were the most important variables in this model. HSIL, ASC-US, and other high-risk HPV strains increased the likelihood of a positive outcome. Overall AUC values for a positive test alone were 0.74 and 0.69 for CIN2 and CIN3 prediction, respectively. For CIN2 prediction, the XGBoost model performed well, with 71% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an AUC value of 0.90. However, the model had 96% sensitivity, 25% specificity, and 0.58 AUC for CIN3 prediction. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patient characteristics and risk factors can influence CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS positivity rates and they need to be carefully considered before choosing a specific management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172200
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Virological Profiles Associated with CINTEC® PLUS Positivity: A Data-Driven Clustering and Modeling Study

Valeriu Harabor, Anamaria Hărăbor, Ana-Maria Adam, Răzvan Socolov et al.
Diagnostics
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Clinical and Virological Profiles Associated with CINTEC® PLUS Positivity: A Data-Driven Clustering and Modeling Study

Valeriu Harabor, Anamaria Hărăbor, Ana-Maria Adam, Răzvan Socolov, Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache, Demetra Gabriela Socolov, Petronela Vicoveanu, Gigi Adam, Alina-Mihaela Călin, Iulian-Valentin Munteanu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The diagnostic performance of CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS can be influenced by numerous patient characteristics and risk factors. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and model the risk factors associated with CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS test positivity in patients undergoing cervical cancer screening and to assess their predictive performance for the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 using an unsupervised machine learning-based model. <b>Methods</b>: Medical data of 134 patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection who underwent CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS testing were used to model the impact of risk factors on dual-stain cytology positivity and to evaluate the predictive performance for CIN2/3. <b>Results</b>: The gradient boosting classifier for the prediction of CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS positivity using clinical risk factors had a precision of 75%, an overall accuracy of 0.62, and an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.77. Body mass index and age were the most important variables in this model. HSIL, ASC-US, and other high-risk HPV strains increased the likelihood of a positive outcome. Overall AUC values for a positive test alone were 0.74 and 0.69 for CIN2 and CIN3 prediction, respectively. For CIN2 prediction, the XGBoost model performed well, with 71% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and an AUC value of 0.90. However, the model had 96% sensitivity, 25% specificity, and 0.58 AUC for CIN3 prediction. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patient characteristics and risk factors can influence CINtec<sup>®</sup> PLUS positivity rates and they need to be carefully considered before choosing a specific management.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(17)
Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.