A survey of commercially available AgTech products for precision grain farming: technological trends and gaps

Australia is emerging as a hub for Agriculture 4.0; however, adoption of agricultural technologies (AgTech) remains limited due to economic constraints, infrastructure gaps, fragmentation, and interoperability challenges. This study aims to categorise the diverse range of commercially available AgTech products and map their distribution across data acquisition platforms, crop management practices, and the precision agriculture cycle, while also exploring potential adoption barriers based on their market availability. We classified data acquisition platforms utilised by the current commercial products. Then, we categorised the major crop management practices in grain farming. We also proposed a framework of the stages of precision agriculture that align with existing market products. We developed a novel taxonomy to categorise the technologies utilised by the AgTech industry for grain farming. We searched four Australian AgTech databases using a search strategy to capture all relevant commercial products related to the proposed crop management categories. In this survey, we categorised 80 AgTech products that provide tangible solutions to current farming practices based on the proposed taxonomy. We also analysed the current trends by mapping products across data acquisition platforms, crop management practices, and the precision agriculture cycle, as well as the types of technologies. Results show that commercial AgTech products mostly rely on ground-based stationary platforms for data acquisition, focus on crop protection, integrate proprietary hardware, and emphasise data visualisation rather than generating actionable insights. This finding also suggests that the high prevalence of proprietary hardware integration may indicate interoperability challenges, a significant barrier to AgTech adoption. Overall, this survey maps the breadth of commercially available AgTech in the grains industry and also discusses the opportunities for future research and innovation. • We develop a novel taxonomy to classify AgTech and profile 80 commercial products. • AgTech products mainly use ground-based sensors for crop protection and irrigation. • Prevalence of proprietary data integration signals cross-platform interoperability. • IoT and computing technologies focus on data visualisations than insights. • Gaps exist in using UAV, robotics, GIS and AI/AR in real-world AgTech applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101345
Primary Topic
QR Code Applications and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey of commercially available AgTech products for precision grain farming: technological trends and gaps

Sayma Shammi, Michael Scobie, Justine Baillie
Smart Agricultural Technology
QR Code Applications and Technologies
article

A survey of commercially available AgTech products for precision grain farming: technological trends and gaps

Sayma Shammi, Michael Scobie, Justine Baillie
article en

Abstract

Australia is emerging as a hub for Agriculture 4.0; however, adoption of agricultural technologies (AgTech) remains limited due to economic constraints, infrastructure gaps, fragmentation, and interoperability challenges. This study aims to categorise the diverse range of commercially available AgTech products and map their distribution across data acquisition platforms, crop management practices, and the precision agriculture cycle, while also exploring potential adoption barriers based on their market availability. We classified data acquisition platforms utilised by the current commercial products. Then, we categorised the major crop management practices in grain farming. We also proposed a framework of the stages of precision agriculture that align with existing market products. We developed a novel taxonomy to categorise the technologies utilised by the AgTech industry for grain farming. We searched four Australian AgTech databases using a search strategy to capture all relevant commercial products related to the proposed crop management categories. In this survey, we categorised 80 AgTech products that provide tangible solutions to current farming practices based on the proposed taxonomy. We also analysed the current trends by mapping products across data acquisition platforms, crop management practices, and the precision agriculture cycle, as well as the types of technologies. Results show that commercial AgTech products mostly rely on ground-based stationary platforms for data acquisition, focus on crop protection, integrate proprietary hardware, and emphasise data visualisation rather than generating actionable insights. This finding also suggests that the high prevalence of proprietary hardware integration may indicate interoperability challenges, a significant barrier to AgTech adoption. Overall, this survey maps the breadth of commercially available AgTech in the grains industry and also discusses the opportunities for future research and innovation. • We develop a novel taxonomy to classify AgTech and profile 80 commercial products. • AgTech products mainly use ground-based sensors for crop protection and irrigation. • Prevalence of proprietary data integration signals cross-platform interoperability. • IoT and computing technologies focus on data visualisations than insights. • Gaps exist in using UAV, robotics, GIS and AI/AR in real-world AgTech applications.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 12
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Grains Research and Development Corporation, University of Southern Queensland
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
QR Code Applications and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.