Mechanistic study of enzymatic hydrolysis of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(pentamethylene 2,5-furanoate)-based blend and block copolymer

• PBS and PPeF were successfully combined into blend or copolymer • Each formulation held different behaviour when hydrolysed through enzymes • Humicola insolens cutinase was effective for depolymerization at low concentration • PBS and the physical blends were easier depolymerized Poly(butylene succinate)(PBS) and poly(pentamethylene 2,5-furanoate)(PPeF) are bio-based polymers that proved to be compatible to derive versatile blends. The different mechanical properties resulting from their combinations respond to the diverse needs in food packaging. While already their physical blending lead to products with good flexibility, copolymers showed further improved elasticity while maintaining good gas barrier properties. The possibility of being fully degraded through hydrolytic enzymes places an additional advantage to the fully green potential of these polymers. The two homopolymers, their physical blend as well as copolymer were demonstrated to be decomposed by the Humicola insolens cutinase (HiC) reaching 100 % of weight loss after 24 h of incubation. PBS was hydrolysed faster than PPeF, while, interestingly, at 50% content of each polymer, the physical blend was more susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysis than the copolymer, as resulted from weight loss and HPLC quantification of the released monomers. This trend was even more pronounced related to reduction of molecular weight during the first phase of hydrolysis as indicated by Gel Permeation Chromatography analysis. Surface characterization of the polymers during hydrolysis by using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy likewise confirmed faster hydrolysis of PBS moieties. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance highlighted slower appearance of hydrolysis-related groups in the copolymer when compared to the physical blend. Overall, this mechanistic study indicates that blending or synthetizing copolymers can influence enzymatic hydrolysis with important implications towards exploitation of enzymes as an environmentally benign emerging technology for recycling. The paper reports the assessment of the enzymatic depolymerization mechanisms of PBS and PPeF homopolymer compared to their combination in form of physical blend and block copolymer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2025.111631
Citations
2
Primary Topic
biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic study of enzymatic hydrolysis of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(pentamethylene 2,5-furanoate)-based blend and block copolymer

Felice Quartinello, Michelina Soccio, Alessandro Pellis, Mattia Manfroni et al.
2 citations
Polymer Degradation and Stability
biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
1.19
article

Mechanistic study of enzymatic hydrolysis of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(pentamethylene 2,5-furanoate)-based blend and block copolymer

Felice Quartinello, Michelina Soccio, Alessandro Pellis, Mattia Manfroni, Alessandro Coatti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• PBS and PPeF were successfully combined into blend or copolymer • Each formulation held different behaviour when hydrolysed through enzymes • Humicola insolens cutinase was effective for depolymerization at low concentration • PBS and the physical blends were easier depolymerized Poly(butylene succinate)(PBS) and poly(pentamethylene 2,5-furanoate)(PPeF) are bio-based polymers that proved to be compatible to derive versatile blends. The different mechanical properties resulting from their combinations respond to the diverse needs in food packaging. While already their physical blending lead to products with good flexibility, copolymers showed further improved elasticity while maintaining good gas barrier properties. The possibility of being fully degraded through hydrolytic enzymes places an additional advantage to the fully green potential of these polymers. The two homopolymers, their physical blend as well as copolymer were demonstrated to be decomposed by the Humicola insolens cutinase (HiC) reaching 100 % of weight loss after 24 h of incubation. PBS was hydrolysed faster than PPeF, while, interestingly, at 50% content of each polymer, the physical blend was more susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysis than the copolymer, as resulted from weight loss and HPLC quantification of the released monomers. This trend was even more pronounced related to reduction of molecular weight during the first phase of hydrolysis as indicated by Gel Permeation Chromatography analysis. Surface characterization of the polymers during hydrolysis by using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy likewise confirmed faster hydrolysis of PBS moieties. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance highlighted slower appearance of hydrolysis-related groups in the copolymer when compared to the physical blend. Overall, this mechanistic study indicates that blending or synthetizing copolymers can influence enzymatic hydrolysis with important implications towards exploitation of enzymes as an environmentally benign emerging technology for recycling. The paper reports the assessment of the enzymatic depolymerization mechanisms of PBS and PPeF homopolymer compared to their combination in form of physical blend and block copolymer.

Polymer Degradation and StabilityVol. 242
Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) (AT), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (IT), University of Genoa (IT), BOKU University (AT), University of Bologna (IT)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.