Impact of Donor Type on Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: A Study on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the <scp>EBMT</scp>

Selecting the optimal donor is crucial for optimizing results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We analyzed outcomes based on donor type in 2809 myelofibrosis (MF) patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2015 and 2021 at EBMT centers. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Four groups were compared: matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 742), matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 1401), mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, n = 379) and haploidentical donor (HD, n = 287). After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, 3-year OS rates were 65.8%, 61.5%, 53.2%, and 57.7% for MSD, MUD, MMUD, and HD, respectively. Multivariable analyses (MSD as reference) showed that donor type significantly correlated with OS (HR: 1.63 for MMUD, HR: 1.42 for HD), PFS (HR: 1.38 for MMUD), NRM (HR: 1.73 for MMUD, HR: 1.47 for HD), engraftment (HR: 0.72 for MMUD, HR: 0.40 for HD), grade 2-4 acute GvHD (HR: 1.53 for MUD, HR: 1.69 for MMUD, HR: 1.49 for HD), and extensive chronic GvHD (HR: 0.77 for MUD, HR: 0.65 for HD). Donor type was not associated with relapse risk. In patients over 60 years, correlations between donor type and outcomes were consistent with those in the overall study population. In summary, with current practices, MF patients receiving MSD or MUD grafts achieve comparable outcomes. In contrast, MMUD and HD transplants have worse OS due to increased NRM. MMUD transplants have a higher risk of GvHD than HD transplants, but this difference seems to disappear with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hematology
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70049
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Donor Type on Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: A Study on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Kavita K Raj, Jakob Robert Passweg, Tomasz Czerw, Nicola Polverelli et al.
American Journal of Hematology
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Impact of Donor Type on Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: A Study on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Kavita K Raj, Jakob Robert Passweg, Tomasz Czerw, Nicola Polverelli, Marie Robin, Donal P. McLornan, Didier Blaise, Giorgia Battipaglia, Andrew Clark, Henrik Sengeløv, Patrizia Chiusolo, Ibrahim Yakoub‐Agha, Massimiliano Gambella, Joanna Ewa Drozd-Sokolowska, Piero Galieni, Juan Carlos Hernández‐Boluda, Robert Zeiser, M. Stelljes, Vipul Sheth, Simona Iacobelli, Urpu Salmenniemi, Thomas Schroeder, Linda Köster, Nicolaus Kröger, Werner Rabisch
article en

Abstract

Selecting the optimal donor is crucial for optimizing results of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We analyzed outcomes based on donor type in 2809 myelofibrosis (MF) patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2015 and 2021 at EBMT centers. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), engraftment, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Four groups were compared: matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 742), matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 1401), mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, n = 379) and haploidentical donor (HD, n = 287). After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, 3-year OS rates were 65.8%, 61.5%, 53.2%, and 57.7% for MSD, MUD, MMUD, and HD, respectively. Multivariable analyses (MSD as reference) showed that donor type significantly correlated with OS (HR: 1.63 for MMUD, HR: 1.42 for HD), PFS (HR: 1.38 for MMUD), NRM (HR: 1.73 for MMUD, HR: 1.47 for HD), engraftment (HR: 0.72 for MMUD, HR: 0.40 for HD), grade 2-4 acute GvHD (HR: 1.53 for MUD, HR: 1.69 for MMUD, HR: 1.49 for HD), and extensive chronic GvHD (HR: 0.77 for MUD, HR: 0.65 for HD). Donor type was not associated with relapse risk. In patients over 60 years, correlations between donor type and outcomes were consistent with those in the overall study population. In summary, with current practices, MF patients receiving MSD or MUD grafts achieve comparable outcomes. In contrast, MMUD and HD transplants have worse OS due to increased NRM. MMUD transplants have a higher risk of GvHD than HD transplants, but this difference seems to disappear with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

American Journal of HematologyVol. 100(11)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Inserm (FR), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Freiburg (DE), University of Münster (DE), Université de Lille (FR), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Rigshospitalet (DK), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre (IN), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (NL), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Essen University Hospital (DE), Nini Hospital (LB), Central Clinical Hospital (PL), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Universitätszahnklinik Wien (AT), Department of Public Health (MM), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.