Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence from Nine European Countries

Recent studies in the United States and Europe have documented a growing divergence in voting behaviour and political attitudes between cities and the countryside. However, we still lack systematic evidence on the extent to which this urban-rural divide is also affectively polarised. To shed light on this, we advance the concept of place-based affective polarisation, which we define as the difference between in-group and out-group affect in relation to place-based groups. Drawing on original survey data from nine European countries, we show that place-based affective polarisation is substantial along the urban-rural divide and associated with strong feelings of place-based resentment and identity. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of place-based affective polarisation correlate with support for GAL parties (green, alternative, libertarian) among urbanites and support for TAN parties (traditional, authoritarian, nationalist) among ruralites. Overall, our findings point to a strong political cleavage between urban and rural areas in several European countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251369317
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence from Nine European Countries

Sven Hegewald, Dominik Schraff
2 citations
Comparative Political Studies
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
8.40
article

Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence from Nine European Countries

Sven Hegewald, Dominik Schraff
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recent studies in the United States and Europe have documented a growing divergence in voting behaviour and political attitudes between cities and the countryside. However, we still lack systematic evidence on the extent to which this urban-rural divide is also affectively polarised. To shed light on this, we advance the concept of place-based affective polarisation, which we define as the difference between in-group and out-group affect in relation to place-based groups. Drawing on original survey data from nine European countries, we show that place-based affective polarisation is substantial along the urban-rural divide and associated with strong feelings of place-based resentment and identity. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of place-based affective polarisation correlate with support for GAL parties (green, alternative, libertarian) among urbanites and support for TAN parties (traditional, authoritarian, nationalist) among ruralites. Overall, our findings point to a strong political cleavage between urban and rural areas in several European countries.

Comparative Political Studies
ETH Zurich (CH), Aalborg University (DK)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence from Nine European Countries — Sven Hegewald, Dominik Schraff · Comparative Political Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS