Pre-sleep milk-derived proteins do not impair sleep or recovery in elite female athletes

Purpose Sleep is essential for recovery in athletes and overall health. While pre-sleep feeding (PSF), defined as consuming calories 2 hours after the last meal and 30 minutes before bed, is theorized to influence sleep and recovery, there is both a paucity of and conflicting data on whether PSF improves or impairs sleep quality and recovery. α-Lactalbumin (a milk-derived protein), in particular, is hypothesized to be a potentially superior PSF option due to its high tryptophan content, yet little data exist regarding its efficacy compared to other strategies.Methods This randomized, double-blind, crossover study investigated the effects of four pre-sleep feeding treatments over a 4–8 week period in elite NCAA Division 1 female athletes (n = 25). Each participant consumed 40 g of: (1) α-Lactalbumin (ALA); (2) casein protein (CAS); (3) carbohydrate (CHO); or (4) non-caloric placebo (PLA) mixed with water, for three consecutive nights, two hours after last meal, 30 mins before bed. Diets were tracked using food logs. Objective sleep (total sleep time [TST]) and recovery metrics (heart rate variability [HRV] and resting heart rate [RHR]) were collected continuously using a wrist-worn device. Daily morning questionnaires assessed subjective sleep (subjective sleep quality [SSQ] and subjective sleep onset latency [SSOL]) and subjective recovery (SREC). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.Results Twenty-one (n = 21) female athletes completed the study (body mass: 66.89 ± 11.85 kg; body fat% %: 27.28 ± 4.57%; height: 1.69 ± 0.07 m, BMI of 23.28 ± 2.96 kg/m2; FFMI of 16.85 ± 1.74 kg/m2). No significant differences were observed between the four treatments for any objective sleep metrics (TST: PLA 7.52 ± 1.11 h; CHO 7.62 ± 1.06 h; ALA 7.53 ± 0.89 h; CAS 7.47 ± 1.14 h; p = 0.91), subjective sleep metrics (SSQ: PLA 71.31 ± 20.60; CHO 74.88 ± 17.81; ALA 72.92 ± 15.39; CAS 69.12 ± 16.66; p = 0.35; SSOL: PLA 16.62 ± 14.08 min; CHO 16.45 ± 12.28 min; ALA 20.21 ± 16.83 min; CAS 18.09 ± 18.71 min; p = 0.20), or objective and subjective recovery metrics (RHR: PLA 53.71 ± 6.55 bpm; CHO 54.05 ± 6.66 bpm; ALA 53.54 ± 6.19 bpm; CAS 53.71 ± 5.42 bpm; p = 0.99; HRV: PLA 98.24 ± 34.01 ms; CHO 99.14 ± 34.08 ms; ALA 103.91 ± 31.48 ms; CAS 103.05 ± 34.60 ms; p = 0.54; SREC: PLA 65.93 ± 20.40; CHO 65.64 ± 19.22; ALA 64.73 ± 17.06; CAS 60.93 ± 19.76; p = 0.43).Conclusion PSF, specifically a 40 g protein bolus, does not negatively affect objective or subjective sleep quality or recovery in elite female athletes. In addition, α-lactalbumin (43% α-Lactalbumin) does not influence sleep more than other pre-sleep protein options. PSF may provide a valuable opportunity to meet calorie and macronutrient needs, especially protein, essential for supporting recovery and adaptation in this population, without impacting sleep.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2025.2550204
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre-sleep milk-derived proteins do not impair sleep or recovery in elite female athletes

Kieran Paterson, Michael J. Ormsbee, Matthew D. Vukovich, Timothy D. Griest
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Pre-sleep milk-derived proteins do not impair sleep or recovery in elite female athletes

Kieran Paterson, Michael J. Ormsbee, Matthew D. Vukovich, Timothy D. Griest
article en

Abstract

Purpose Sleep is essential for recovery in athletes and overall health. While pre-sleep feeding (PSF), defined as consuming calories 2 hours after the last meal and 30 minutes before bed, is theorized to influence sleep and recovery, there is both a paucity of and conflicting data on whether PSF improves or impairs sleep quality and recovery. α-Lactalbumin (a milk-derived protein), in particular, is hypothesized to be a potentially superior PSF option due to its high tryptophan content, yet little data exist regarding its efficacy compared to other strategies.Methods This randomized, double-blind, crossover study investigated the effects of four pre-sleep feeding treatments over a 4–8 week period in elite NCAA Division 1 female athletes (n = 25). Each participant consumed 40 g of: (1) α-Lactalbumin (ALA); (2) casein protein (CAS); (3) carbohydrate (CHO); or (4) non-caloric placebo (PLA) mixed with water, for three consecutive nights, two hours after last meal, 30 mins before bed. Diets were tracked using food logs. Objective sleep (total sleep time [TST]) and recovery metrics (heart rate variability [HRV] and resting heart rate [RHR]) were collected continuously using a wrist-worn device. Daily morning questionnaires assessed subjective sleep (subjective sleep quality [SSQ] and subjective sleep onset latency [SSOL]) and subjective recovery (SREC). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.Results Twenty-one (n = 21) female athletes completed the study (body mass: 66.89 ± 11.85 kg; body fat% %: 27.28 ± 4.57%; height: 1.69 ± 0.07 m, BMI of 23.28 ± 2.96 kg/m2; FFMI of 16.85 ± 1.74 kg/m2). No significant differences were observed between the four treatments for any objective sleep metrics (TST: PLA 7.52 ± 1.11 h; CHO 7.62 ± 1.06 h; ALA 7.53 ± 0.89 h; CAS 7.47 ± 1.14 h; p = 0.91), subjective sleep metrics (SSQ: PLA 71.31 ± 20.60; CHO 74.88 ± 17.81; ALA 72.92 ± 15.39; CAS 69.12 ± 16.66; p = 0.35; SSOL: PLA 16.62 ± 14.08 min; CHO 16.45 ± 12.28 min; ALA 20.21 ± 16.83 min; CAS 18.09 ± 18.71 min; p = 0.20), or objective and subjective recovery metrics (RHR: PLA 53.71 ± 6.55 bpm; CHO 54.05 ± 6.66 bpm; ALA 53.54 ± 6.19 bpm; CAS 53.71 ± 5.42 bpm; p = 0.99; HRV: PLA 98.24 ± 34.01 ms; CHO 99.14 ± 34.08 ms; ALA 103.91 ± 31.48 ms; CAS 103.05 ± 34.60 ms; p = 0.54; SREC: PLA 65.93 ± 20.40; CHO 65.64 ± 19.22; ALA 64.73 ± 17.06; CAS 60.93 ± 19.76; p = 0.43).Conclusion PSF, specifically a 40 g protein bolus, does not negatively affect objective or subjective sleep quality or recovery in elite female athletes. In addition, α-lactalbumin (43% α-Lactalbumin) does not influence sleep more than other pre-sleep protein options. PSF may provide a valuable opportunity to meet calorie and macronutrient needs, especially protein, essential for supporting recovery and adaptation in this population, without impacting sleep.

Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionVol. 22(sup2)
Florida State University (US), South Dakota State University (US), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.