Risks to wildlife for what benefit? Did these security fences really need barbed wire?

ABSTRACT Barbed wire, widely used in security fencing, is well-documented to cause impalements in wildlife. These risks are unwarranted in fences with barbed wire that are compromised in their security effectiveness. These include discontinuous fences that do not fully enclose properties, leaving properties openly accessible. Perimeters with barbed wire may have gaps where fences do not adjoin neatly or gates secured with long chains leave a gap, which in both cases enable potential intruders to fit through. Fences without sufficient proximity to the ground also leave a gap that potential intruders can crawl through. Structures adjacent to fences may also provide climbing aids. Additionally, situations where fencing is directly parallel to tall walls renders the fence redundant. In the interests of reducing harm to wildlife, land holders should consider whether barbed wire in their fencing retains a valid function and remove barbed wire in unwarranted instances.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Zoologist
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2025.030
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risks to wildlife for what benefit? Did these security fences really need barbed wire?

Matthew Mo
Australian Zoologist
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

Risks to wildlife for what benefit? Did these security fences really need barbed wire?

Matthew Mo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Barbed wire, widely used in security fencing, is well-documented to cause impalements in wildlife. These risks are unwarranted in fences with barbed wire that are compromised in their security effectiveness. These include discontinuous fences that do not fully enclose properties, leaving properties openly accessible. Perimeters with barbed wire may have gaps where fences do not adjoin neatly or gates secured with long chains leave a gap, which in both cases enable potential intruders to fit through. Fences without sufficient proximity to the ground also leave a gap that potential intruders can crawl through. Structures adjacent to fences may also provide climbing aids. Additionally, situations where fencing is directly parallel to tall walls renders the fence redundant. In the interests of reducing harm to wildlife, land holders should consider whether barbed wire in their fencing retains a valid function and remove barbed wire in unwarranted instances.

Australian ZoologistVol. 44(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risks to wildlife for what benefit? Did these security fences really need barbed wire? — Matthew Mo · Australian Zoologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS