Threats perceived by five prominent U.S. commercial fisheries

ABSTRACT Objective Regulations and ecosystem changes can have profound effects on commercial fishermen’s livelihoods. Consequently, there has been an increasing emphasis on including stakeholder inputs and perceptions into fisheries regulatory processes. However, these assessments typically focus on a single fishery and are often limited to a single pressure. We used a public document review followed by focus groups with members of the commercial fishing industry to compare the array of risks across multiple fisheries. Methods We identified the suite of recent threats perceived by five commercial fisheries in the U.S. Atlantic Northeast and Pacific Northwest: the Alaskan Directed Halibut fishery (Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis); the Bering Sea Pollock Catcher–Processor fishery (Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus); the Central Gulf of Alaska Trawl fishery, homeported in Kodiak, Alaska; the Northeast Multispecies Groundfish fishery; and the Sea Scallop fishery (Atlantic sea scallop Placopecten magellanicus). Risks were identified for each fishery through a public document review (e.g., fishing industry-focused outlets, local news sources, and government documents, including fishery management council meeting minutes and public comments), followed by focus groups with members of each fishery to clarify, refine, and identify additional risks. Results Risks that manifested in public domains were largely different—and incomplete—compared to what members of the fishing industry believed were relevant. Further, the fishing industry is concerned with risks that management is not currently designed to address. Finally, despite each fishery having distinct operational, structural, and geographic differences, many of the identified risks were similar or even identical across fisheries. Conclusions Examining and sharing the lessons learned about risk perceptions across these fisheries highlight both challenges and potential strategies for enhancing fishery resiliency in the United States.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt/vqaf075
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Threats perceived by five prominent U.S. commercial fisheries

Robert Murphy, Steven B. Scyphers, Jonathan H. Grabowski, Sarah L. Gibbs et al.
1 citations
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Marine and fisheries research
1.11
article

Threats perceived by five prominent U.S. commercial fisheries

Robert Murphy, Steven B. Scyphers, Jonathan H. Grabowski, Sarah L. Gibbs, Bradley P. Harris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Regulations and ecosystem changes can have profound effects on commercial fishermen’s livelihoods. Consequently, there has been an increasing emphasis on including stakeholder inputs and perceptions into fisheries regulatory processes. However, these assessments typically focus on a single fishery and are often limited to a single pressure. We used a public document review followed by focus groups with members of the commercial fishing industry to compare the array of risks across multiple fisheries. Methods We identified the suite of recent threats perceived by five commercial fisheries in the U.S. Atlantic Northeast and Pacific Northwest: the Alaskan Directed Halibut fishery (Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis); the Bering Sea Pollock Catcher–Processor fishery (Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus); the Central Gulf of Alaska Trawl fishery, homeported in Kodiak, Alaska; the Northeast Multispecies Groundfish fishery; and the Sea Scallop fishery (Atlantic sea scallop Placopecten magellanicus). Risks were identified for each fishery through a public document review (e.g., fishing industry-focused outlets, local news sources, and government documents, including fishery management council meeting minutes and public comments), followed by focus groups with members of each fishery to clarify, refine, and identify additional risks. Results Risks that manifested in public domains were largely different—and incomplete—compared to what members of the fishing industry believed were relevant. Further, the fishing industry is concerned with risks that management is not currently designed to address. Finally, despite each fishery having distinct operational, structural, and geographic differences, many of the identified risks were similar or even identical across fisheries. Conclusions Examining and sharing the lessons learned about risk perceptions across these fisheries highlight both challenges and potential strategies for enhancing fishery resiliency in the United States.

North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementVol. 45(5)
Alaska Pacific University (US), Northeastern University (US), Dauphin Island Sea Lab (US), University of South Alabama (US)
North Pacific Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Marine and fisheries research
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.